News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AMD's CDNA 3 Compute Architecture. Parent comment

Re:AMD's CDNA 3 Compute Architecture by einpoklum on Monday December 18, 2023 @04:08AM (#38680541)
OpenCL has had a C++ variant for a while. But it is like you said: The consortium members, especially NVIDIA, did not do thing properly, either half-heartedly or in an intentionally broken manner.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD's CDNA 3 Compute Architecture by pjmlp on Monday December 18, 2023 @04:53AM (#38680771)
Always blamming NVidia, when Intel and AMD never did anything to properly support it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD's CDNA 3 Compute Architecture by ksec on Monday December 18, 2023 @10:56AM (#38684185)
>Always blamming NVidia

As LLM, AI takes over the heated topic of discussions on HN, it is hard not to notice the tone on blaming Nvidia for everything. Both Hardware and Software.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD's CDNA 3 Compute Architecture by fulafel on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @01:55AM (#38692674)
I think we should be blaming the OS platform actors and user communities for letting the lunatics run the asylum (hw vendors dictating sw). And then MS & Apple both went ant did their own proprietary stuff.
[ Parent | on HN ]