Re:65% increase in "significant" Air Traffic Control inciden...
by mcphage on Saturday December 09, 2023 @11:51PM
(#38589187)
> You should not know and should not take it in consideration
Then how do you suppose we ended up with fields where nearly everyone was a white male, if race was never taken into consideration?
Re:65% increase in "significant" Air Traffic Control inciden...
by jimbob45 on Sunday December 10, 2023 @02:27AM
(#38589818)
Because whites were 85% of the US population for a long time and being a SAHM used to be a viable strategy.
Re:65% increase in "significant" Air Traffic Control inciden...
by PromKwing on Sunday December 10, 2023 @12:41AM
(#38589421)
> but it seems to have been perverted into caricaturical discrimination _for_, even favoring a diverse incompetent candidate over a non-diverse competent one.
That's a crazy claim told without any proof. I don't see any studies, sources linked in your comment. That just sounds like your own anecdotal perspective.
You should not know and should not take it in consideration but in the USA this is part of the application. I understand the whole point is to make sure diverse candidate are not discriminated against (and of course that would be a ridiculous thing to do), but it seems to have been perverted into caricaturical discrimination _for_, even favoring a diverse incompetent candidate over a non-diverse competent one.