Re:Apple cuts off Beeper Mini's access
by asylteltine on Friday December 08, 2023 @07:21PM
(#38576791)
This is actually a great point I didn’t originally consider. People could easily infiltrate the iMessage fort with spam and other stuff which at the moment requires a genuine Apple device.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple cuts off Beeper Mini's access
by singpolyma3 on Friday December 08, 2023 @07:47PM
(#38577019)
Still need a valid phone number with a SIM that can do the special SMS needed for this, so it's hardly going to produce a big spam farm too fast.
Better to kill it early. I get spam calls on WhatsApp (an app which I absolutely loathe)
Re:Apple cuts off Beeper Mini's access
by asylteltine on Saturday December 09, 2023 @10:33AM
(#38582701)
It’s completely trivial to get a real number for sms these days thanks to scum like twilio. You can use your legitimate Apple device identifiers to run something like a hackintosh and then use iMessage that way, or use the script linked last week.
Re:Apple cuts off Beeper Mini's access
by grupthink on Friday December 08, 2023 @08:15PM
(#38577254)
Wouldn't your iPhone still receive spam SMS text messages with Apple Messages? And isn't Apple Messages commonly exploited by NSO Group (Zero-clicks)? Maybe I'm wrong, but this does not appear to be very fort-like.
Yes. I believe people are just saying that they assume unknown-contact SMS is spam and that sort of sounds like Apple's SMS spam filtering isn't very good.
For iPhone there are two tiers - the carrier provided SMS spam filtering, and apps written to provide such filtering[1].
1: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sms_and_call_repor...
Re:Apple cuts off Beeper Mini's access
by rezonant on Saturday December 09, 2023 @01:03AM
(#38579092)
Oh, so there's no builtin message filtering at all??
This explains some things. Why wouldn't they just add a spam filter. Is there still iCloud email addresses? Do they have spam filtering?
I'm pretty sure some of the spam I am getting was using this vector. Hopefully it kills it now.
that's one of the reasons they're doing this
but I don't think it's their main reason, if anything I see that argument as convenient posturing which aids in covering the uglier underlying reasons