News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by gnicholas on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:44PM (#38104900)
Well, if there's not a cost difference, why do they keep trying to double my pricing when the base tier goes up?

My sense is there is some cost savings at these lower tiers, but more importantly it would prevent ISPs from jacking prices up while using higher speeds as the rationale ("Look, we just tripled your speed, and it only costs double!"). ISPs would be less likely to double prices without any service improvement. But since many people don't care about the service improvement, it's an illusory benefit for them.

Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by whateverman23 on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:51PM (#38105015)
> Well, if there's not a cost difference, why do they keep trying to double my pricing when the base tier goes up?

Because you keep paying for it. It's not like you're going to not pay for internet, and you probably don't have many alternative options.

Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by gnicholas on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:23PM (#38105512)
Yeah, like I said in my original post, it all comes down to competition.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by jacksnipe on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:46PM (#38104941)
They’ve already trained consumers that higher speeds cost more. They would need a compelling reason to keep costs the same after increasing speeds.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by jakogut on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:57PM (#38105108)
In my area, a competitor just finished installing fiber to my neighborhood, and is offering symmetrical gigabit speeds for less (nearly half the price) than I was paying for 500/20 Mbps to the incumbent cable company before.

The cable company now needs to both increase speeds _and_ lower prices to even keep their existing customers. This is a good place to be, as a customer.

Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by vel0city on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:54PM (#38105058)
I've had many instances where ISPs increased my speeds without increasing prices.

If pricing stayed even close to fixed my gigabit internet would cost well over $10,000mo, considering back in the day I was paying SBC for less than a meg for more than I'm paying for a gigabit today. And that's before adjusting for inflation, those 90s dollars are worth way more than 2023 dollars.

Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by tzs on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @06:16PM (#38106108)
In the almost 20 years I've had Comcast they've increased speeds numerous times without increasing prices.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by Arainach on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:27PM (#38105567)
What makes you think the price wouldn't double if the speed stayed the same? That's what cable prices have done.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by mixdup on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:05PM (#38105227)
>Well, if there's not a cost difference, why do they keep trying to double my pricing when the base tier goes up?

At least they're giving more speed instead of just doubling the cost with no increase in service

Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by HDThoreaun on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:07PM (#38105268)
Because they can? Their goal is to maximize profit, if raising prices does that they'll raise prices.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,... by gopher2000 on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @06:16PM (#38106115)
Because they are for-profit organizations and thus greedy. Pretty easy.