Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by jacksnipe on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:46PM
(#38104941)
They’ve already trained consumers that higher speeds cost more. They would need a compelling reason to keep costs the same after increasing speeds.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by jakogut on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:57PM
(#38105108)
In my area, a competitor just finished installing fiber to my neighborhood, and is offering symmetrical gigabit speeds for less (nearly half the price) than I was paying for 500/20 Mbps to the incumbent cable company before.
The cable company now needs to both increase speeds _and_ lower prices to even keep their existing customers. This is a good place to be, as a customer.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by vel0city on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:54PM
(#38105058)
I've had many instances where ISPs increased my speeds without increasing prices.
If pricing stayed even close to fixed my gigabit internet would cost well over $10,000mo, considering back in the day I was paying SBC for less than a meg for more than I'm paying for a gigabit today. And that's before adjusting for inflation, those 90s dollars are worth way more than 2023 dollars.