News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by otabdeveloper4 on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:07PM (#37837508)
Putting two tons of highly toxic and flammable lithium into a car-shaped object just to commute one person a few dozen miles is quite literally insane from all practical points of view.

Our ancestors will never believe that we were nuts enough to not only allow this, but actually legally manndate it. They will think it's an urban legend and no ancient people could have been so short-sighted and egotistical.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by oblio on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:11PM (#37837567)
> Putting two tons of highly toxic and flammable lithium into a car-shaped object just to commute one person a few dozen miles is quite literally insane from all practical points of view.

And ICEs are powered by many thousands of mini explosions per minute with a side effect of producing an odorless gas that can kill us silently.

Everything can be scaremongered.

And personal transportation, as much as I wish wasn't the case, is a fact of life since 1910.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by tremon on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:49PM (#37838074)
What happened in 1910? The first automobile dates from 1886, and I'm pretty sure the horse&buggy personal transportation method predates it by several centuries.
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by oblio on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @07:39AM (#37843240)
Mass manufacturing. Almost everything became widely available, at least in developing and developed countries.
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by vel0city on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @09:51AM (#37844390)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Model_T

Technically 1908, but we can round.

The first automobiles were practically toys for the rich. Cars didn't really become a "mass market" thing until ~1910.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by parker_mountain on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:10PM (#37837549)
Fun fact: per mile driven, there are about 1/10th to 1/5th as many EV fires, as there are gas car fires.

Putting ten gallons of highly toxic and flammable fuel into a car-shaped object just to commute one person a few dozen miles is quite literally insane from all practical points of view. Electric tech is marginally less crazy, and also a step forward.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by duskwuff on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:38PM (#37837939)
> Putting ten gallons of highly toxic and flammable fuel into a car-shaped object just to commute one person a few dozen miles is quite literally insane from all practical points of view.

And there's another 10-20 gallons of various oils in the engine and transmission. While they aren't nearly as volatile as the gasoline, they're still quite flammable. Really, it's a wonder these things were ever allowed. :)

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by giardini on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @06:44PM (#37838714)
duskwuff says: >"And there's another 10-20 gallons of various oils in the engine and transmission. While they aren't nearly as volatile as the gasoline, they're still quite flammable"<

1. Off by an order of magnitude: ~4-6 quarts of oil in the motor, about the same for the transmission yielding for a large motor about 2 gallons total.

2. duskwuff says >"they're still quite flammable."< Nonsense. Engine oil is so hard to burn that it is not classified as flammable by OSHA:

https://firefighterinsider.com/is-motor-oil-flammable-you-ma...

Furthermore these oils are encased in heavy metal (the engine block, the transmission block and the differential casing).

Starting batteries (the 6- and 12-volt kind) cause more fires than do engine and/or transmission oils.

To paraphrase Charlton Heston: "I'll give you my gasoline car when you can pry it from my cold, greasy, dead hands."

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by r87 on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:27PM (#37837805)
I’d expect that, but would have assumed it is due to there being more old gas vehicles on the road. Is that data normalized for age of the cars driven?

I assume that my neighbors 30 year old gas guzzler is more likely to catch fire than my 1 year old PHEV for example (or maybe I’m more likely since I have both a lithium battery and a gas tank).

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by freedude on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:28PM (#37837818)
That fun fact may be true, but ask any firefighter that has had to put out a lithium based car fire how fun that fact is. The lithium based fires require 12-15 times the amount of water to extinguish.
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by jsight on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @06:05PM (#37838257)
They can also be put out with a blanket apparently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hv2L_QYg4oA

Although weirdly enough the video demonstration doesn't seem to be of a battery fire. :facepalm

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by ben_w on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @06:11PM (#37850964)
Why is water being used for either? One's an electricity-rich fire, the other's an oil-rich fire, water's an unwise response to both for different reasons.
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by robertlagrant on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:27PM (#37837798)
> quite literally insane from all practical points of view

Erm. I don't think that's true.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by rootusrootus on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:14PM (#37837606)
> Putting two tons of highly toxic and flammable lithium

Maybe cut back on the hyperbole a bit. Two tons is the entire car. The lithium content of the battery is 15-20 pounds. And it's not straight lithium metal that becomes flammable in the presence of water. It's the electrolytes that are flammable. And most EVs in the world use LFP, which doesn't have that flammability problem.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by elihu on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @06:53PM (#37838798)
LFPs are flammable too, they just don't tend to ignite as easily. I suspect they're probably easier to put out, but I don't know for sure.

(I'd be curious what the real-life vehicle fire statistics actually are so far for regular lithium ion versus LFP. LFP is promoted as being safer, but at this point there should be enough vehicle fire statistics to be able to quantify how much safer they are. The Tesla Model 3 might be a good model to compare because it's available in both versions, though maybe there just aren't enough model 3 fires to be statistically significant.)

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by rootusrootus on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @07:38PM (#37839167)
The FAA has studied this. LFPs are an order of magnitude less prone to fire, and less intense when they do. There are some fun videos out there put together by fire departments testing various battery chemistries. It's fairly easy to make a regular modern lithium ion battery erupt in flame. It's hard to get LFP to do much more than release the magic smoke. And LTO batteries, which are another variety, don't even smoke.

EV fires are already significantly less common than ICEV fires. Factor in LFP, and maybe we should start kicking ICEVs out of garages because they're unsafe. And lest you think ICEVs don't spontaneously combust -- that's very much incorrect, there have been recent recalls of millions of ICEVs for exactly that.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by elihu on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @10:46PM (#37840318)
I was aware that internal combustion cars catch fire more often. There's a bit of a compensatory difference in severity: EVs don't catch fire as often, but it's especially bad when they do. But hopefully we can quickly move past the era of super-flammable EV batteries even if actual EV fires are rare.

I look forward to kicking fossil fuel based cars out of everywhere for reasons unrelated to safety. Or you could say reasons that have to do with the collective safety of all life on Earth rather than individual safety.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by otabdeveloper4 on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @01:00AM (#37841055)
The negative externalities of the large-scale strip-mining and fossil-fuel-burning effort to convert all cars to electric will not improve the collective safety of life on Earth.

Also, remember that lithium is also a fossil fuel. Electicity is not magic, you're just replacing one fossil fuel with another.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by vel0city on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @10:05AM (#37844565)
> large-scale strip-mining and fossil-fuel-burning effort to convert all cars to electric

What about the large-scale strip-mining, fossil-fuel-burning, and other absolutely nasty environmental efforts of continuing to use oil? And how much of that oil pulled from the ground is actually recyclable and reusable?

> lithium is also a fossil fuel

Lithium is by definition not a fossil fuel, as it isn't from the remains of long dead living organisms. Fossil fuels are all organic chemistry! Lithium is inorganic!

> you're just replacing one fossil fuel with another.

A significant percentage of the electricity from my wall socket does not come from fossil fuels. And even then, the EV is massively more efficient per mile than an equivalent gas car and the natural gas power plant supplying the non-renewable part is also massively more efficient and less emission producing per watt of power than a car's motor. The break even, even if 100% of the electricity was natural gas, is still like 30,000mi.

Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by xtorol on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:15PM (#37837624)
Any mechanism that can store enough energy to get a car from point A to point B is going to store a nontrivial amount of energy and be subject to some eyebrow-raising failure modes. This applies to gasoline, diesel fuel, batteries, and all flavors of hydrogen.
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by wongarsu on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:13PM (#37837590)
We currently put toxic and highly flammable gasoline into car-shaped objects. The car needs to carry its energy with it somehow. Energetic things tend to be flammable and toxic, since those are just uncontrolled ways to release energy
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by MattPalmer1086 on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:10PM (#37837544)
Or possibly our descendants ;)
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by _gtly on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:12PM (#37837571)
A canister of hydrogen in your car isn't exactly safe, either!!
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by jackvalentine on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:13PM (#37837584)
The insane bit when you look at it logically is the car shaped object part - we drive around in and store portable living rooms.
Re:Oil sector is lobbying for inefficient hydrogen cars to d... by otabdeveloper4 on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @12:57AM (#37841040)
Yes, but also the moral crusade to replace "shitty way to live and move around" with "equally shitty way to live and move around, but with a different set of externalities" is equally insane.