Re:The man who did not have a conversation in over 50 years
by dang on Saturday September 30, 2023 @11:32PM
(#37722288)
You can disagree! We don't hold that against anyone.
Your point is good. There's no set of rules that works every time.
I think the root issue is that the Wikipedia article just wasn't the best submission for this story. There were a number of other articles about Mr. Toma's story on the web. Picking the best of those would have been a better strategy, and then the title issue would most likely have taken care of itself.
Your point is good. There's no set of rules that works every time.
I think the root issue is that the Wikipedia article just wasn't the best submission for this story. There were a number of other articles about Mr. Toma's story on the web. Picking the best of those would have been a better strategy, and then the title issue would most likely have taken care of itself.