Re:The man who did not have a conversation in over 50 years
by Clamchop on Saturday September 30, 2023 @11:26PM
(#37722251)
Not wanting to disagree with mods as it's rarely a good look, but in this case, nobody would know why to (and so probably wouldn't) click through with its original title, and the change doesn't appear to meet the English definition of the word editorialize as it's about as flatly descriptive of the point of interest about this man as you can get.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The man who did not have a conversation in over 50 years
by dang on Saturday September 30, 2023 @11:32PM
(#37722288)
You can disagree! We don't hold that against anyone.
Your point is good. There's no set of rules that works every time.
I think the root issue is that the Wikipedia article just wasn't the best submission for this story. There were a number of other articles about Mr. Toma's story on the web. Picking the best of those would have been a better strategy, and then the title issue would most likely have taken care of itself.