News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by nonethewiser on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @04:24PM (#37680753)
The strategy to appease by finding additional revenue sources seems flawed. Regardless of these additional revenue sources, you're still leaving money on the table by not rolling back. Ideally you roll back and add the additional revenue sources.

To be clear, they shouldn't roll back. Because it's shitty. But that's the reason - "It's shitty" - not "we can add additional revenue sources elsewhere too." If you validate ads team's concern for revenue but then dont maximize revenue then you should expect them to be dissatisfied.

Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by lozenge on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @04:30PM (#37680822)
Anil did address that in the earliest message (page 5)
Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by hn_throwaway_99 on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @04:27PM (#37680779)
Detecting sarcasm online these days is nearly impossible.
Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by hackernewds on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @04:39PM (#37680980)
nice rescue hah
Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by whimsicalism on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @09:15PM (#37683931)
It makes sense if there is a threshold for wall street expectations in what is a hit vs a miss