Re:Mozilla.ai
by c7DJTLrn on Monday September 25, 2023 @09:54PM
(#37653333)
Very vague objective with $30 million thrown at it. That money ain't coming back out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
At least they secured mozilla.ai domain
I can't see that as having been of high demand by anyone else.
Re:Mozilla.ai
by CameronNemo on Monday September 25, 2023 @10:16PM
(#37653486)
Scams, likely!
Money well spent haha
Re:Mozilla.ai
by CameronNemo on Monday September 25, 2023 @10:16PM
(#37653492)
Yeah they can host one webpage that links back to Mozilla.org. Nice!
Haha yeah even with the very specific project of “build a reliable, privacy oriented browser”, you’re scratching your head at where the money went.
Like, “no unsigned extensions” with “oops we forgot to renew the cert, and you can’t opt out, hope your life didn’t depend on any privacy extensions or anything!”
They need to divert profits to stay valid on their non-profit tax exemption. Just a wild guess.
That's not how a 501c3 charity works. There are very strict rules about what the charitable funds can be used for, and "software development" (let alone "AI development") isn't one of those, even if the software is given away for free.
"To establish 501(c)(3) status, your organization needs to be charitable (providing relief to the needy or distressed), educational (improving skills of individuals or providing useful information to the general public), scientific (research in a manner sufficiently in the public interest and not commercial), or in a few other categories (religious, youth amateur sports, etc.)."
https://www.mill.law/blog/more-501c3-rejections-open-source-...
The Mozilla Foundation, the charity part, uses its funds for education.
Funds can be used for operations, which can include software development. (Not really applicable in the Mozilla.ai case, where software would likely be the raison d'etre