News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by standardUser on Monday September 25, 2023 @11:45AM (#37645744)
The first thing that comes to mind is the conservative movements growing obsessions with pedophilia, real and imagined. It has become the visceral hook that seems to emotionally motivate a lot of the far-right, not unlike abortion.
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by AnimalMuppet on Monday September 25, 2023 @12:22PM (#37646404)
Let's stick with "real" for a moment. There is absolutely nothing about real pedophilia that makes it a far-right-only concern. In fact, with the left's concern about sexual abuse of women, they ought to also care about sexual abuse of minors.
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by standardUser on Monday September 25, 2023 @12:35PM (#37646614)
You are asserting that people who are not far-right do not care about the abuse of minors, which is a nonsensical belief with no connection to reality and completely undermines whatever point you're trying to make.

But it is a good example of the over-the-top rhetoric being used around this exact issue.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by AnimalMuppet on Monday September 25, 2023 @12:47PM (#37646807)
I am not claiming what you say I am.

You said:

"It [pedophilia] has become the visceral hook that seems to emotionally motivate a lot of the far-right, not unlike abortion."

I am claiming that pedophilia motivates many people, not just the far right. It is beyond me how you could misread that claim into something that would lead you to reply as you did.

[Edit: My use of "ought to" may be the problem. The left, based on their positions, should be emotionally, viscerally motivated to oppose pedophilia. If they aren't, then that is an inconsistency in their position. But I think that they (or at least many of them) are motivated. So, to sum up, I'm not sure why you singled out the far-right in your initial statement.]

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by standardUser on Monday September 25, 2023 @12:55PM (#37646952)
"...they ought to also care about sexual abuse of minors."

That implies they do not care about the sexual abuse of minors, but they ought to.

"There is absolutely nothing about real pedophilia that makes it a far-right-only concern"

And implying that anyone, anywhere would think that it is a "far-right only concern" is absurd framing. It's make-believe nonsense.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by Dylan16807 on Monday September 25, 2023 @01:06PM (#37647169)
Yes it's your use of ought to, and no there isn't an inconsistency.

Being "emotionally, viscerally" motivated, to the extent that it's very obvious, tends to make people do stupid and counterproductive things. You shouldn't be demanding that.

> I'm not sure why you singled out the far-right in your initial statement.

Because of their horrible politicized accusations that take attention away from the actual problems.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by notahacker on Monday September 25, 2023 @01:09PM (#37647221)
It's much easier to misinterpret your statement that the left ought to care about paedophilia as a claim they don't (even if that was not your intent) than it would have been for you to interpret the OP about "obsessions... real and imagined" as a claim that paedophilia in general is a far right only concern...

Particularly in the context of the appeal of an ad dubiously associating a California tech co with paedophilia to people who believe stuff like Pizzagate and Q because they're inclined to suspect everybody they don't like is in league with the paedos

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by RIMR on Monday September 25, 2023 @12:36PM (#37646617)
I have never met anyone on the left that isn't disgusted by the sexual abuse of minors. Just the perfectly rational acknowledgement that the sexual abuse of women is a more widespread problem.

Child sex abuse is more common that it ever should be, but it is not the epidemic of child abuse that the right characterizes it to be. Accusations of pedophilia are extremely commonplace on the right, even when there is absolutely no evidence, largely because it is the most horrifying thing you can accuse another person of doing, and because the moral panic you can instill in your supporters if you convince them is a highly effective political weapon.

If anything, the people who scream about pedophila the loudest are the ones showing their apathy towards actual real-world child sex abuse, because they are doing so in bad faith, not to protect actual children, but to score political points through slander. If anything that helps obfuscate and enable child abusers, since the focus is now on conspiracy theories and targeted defamation.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by dfxm12 on Monday September 25, 2023 @01:19PM (#37647388)
Accusations of pedophilia are extremely commonplace on the right

Every accusation is an admission.

I don't know how anyone takes American (and probably other) conservatives seriously on this topic when they are constantly trying to block laws that will make it harder to marry children [0], [1], or defending the practice in general [2].

0 - https://apnews.com/article/child-marriage-west-virginia-bill...

1 - https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-polit...

2 - https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/missouri-lawmaker-defends-...

[dead]
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by catlover76 on Monday September 25, 2023 @02:48PM (#37648688)
There are a number of objections to specific points in your comment, as well as your overall perspective, but I think the biggest one is that your kids don't need to be using YouTube, Discord, or other apps.
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by wkat4242 on Monday September 25, 2023 @03:50PM (#37649593)
I know several people in transition (and post) and the one thing that stands out is how carefully it is done. You don't go to the doctor and order a sex change like it's a Big Mac. There's a whole support trajectory of psychological evaluation and support and transition is the last option. Of course they know gender dysphoria is often a temporary phase.

No kid will get "castrated" just to fit in. Actual gender change operations aren't even done until adulthood, only puberty blockers are sometimes used which are reversible. And only if the child's dysphoria is so extreme it really impacts their quality of life or endangers them (think self-harm). In this sense it's entirely "for the children".

Also 99% of trans people have no regrets. The system works. I think it's amazing that we live in a world where people can decide their own life and body. And I don't really get the whole hate against trans people. It's not like they're harming anyone.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by camgunz on Monday September 25, 2023 @07:26PM (#37652166)
Yeah there's a strong "castration" thing being pushed by right-wing media but it's not a thing. Kind of cool in a way to watch it spread like a virus across social media and general society though, but also a little horrifying.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/detransitioned-boy-castrated-b... (Note the total lack of sourcing)

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/05/scicheck-young-children-do...

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/05/viral-imag...

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by wkat4242 on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @02:19AM (#37655126)
Yeah and I think the whole "rise" in transgender cases is better explained by considering that it was a huge taboo until recently and there's now actual operations available and accessible (insurance) to people that weren't before

People forget also that the parents have the final say in these matters until the child matures. Nobody is coming to castrate your kids :P

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by banhamm on Monday September 25, 2023 @07:33PM (#37652224)
> And I don't really get the whole hate against trans people. It's not like they're harming anyone.

Tell that to all the lesbian women who've had their social and dating spaces overrun by men pretending to be women. Or to the female prisoners forced to share cells with such men. Or indeed to any woman who's had to deal with one of these men invading a female-only space for his own selfish delight.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by wkat4242 on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @01:28AM (#37654828)
They're not men pretending to be women, they are women.

And a trans operation is obviously not done to be able to snoop in the women's shower.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by banhamm on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @04:29AM (#37656178)
> They're not men pretending to be women, they are women.

This reality-defying assertion always reminds me of the Catholic belief in transubstantiation. Their position is that even though the bread looks like bread, tastes like bread, behaves like bread, has all the properties of bread, and so on, it somehow is literally the body of Christ in substance.

Just like how these men are somehow literally women, according to acolytes of the transgender belief system.

It's nonsensical. Why do you even believe this?

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by wkat4242 on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @02:24PM (#37663675)
It's called respect for people's gender identity.
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by banhamm on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @02:06PM (#37678665)
How about some respect for women who want and need female-only spaces?
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by null0pointer on Monday September 25, 2023 @09:41PM (#37653260)
> Actual gender change operations aren’t even done until adulthood

This seems to be false according to this article [1] which claims that “In the three years ending in 2021, at least 776 mastectomies were performed in the United States on patients ages 13 to 17 with a gender dysphoria diagnosis, according to Komodo’s data analysis of insurance claims.”

1: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-tran...

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by wkat4242 on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @01:31AM (#37654844)
In Holland it's forbidden under 18, I don't know about the US. But 776 people is obviously not a lot on the population of the US. That's one in half a million.
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by standardUser on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @01:38PM (#37678202)
You are talking about such a tiny number of people compared to the overall population that many of those individuals could be intersex or otherwise have health or genetic problems that led to procedures at such a young age.

In fact, it's kind of fucked up how the entire anti-trans movement completely pretends intersex people do not exist.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by vGPU on Monday September 25, 2023 @11:12PM (#37653861)
Puberty blockers are not reversible. If used for more than a year or so, they significantly stunt brain development and greatly increase the odds of infertility and other future health problems.

>99% have no regrets

Why is the suicide rate so high then?

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by wkat4242 on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @01:30AM (#37654837)
Puberty blockers don't make you dumber, they could affect fertility sometimes but it's not a huge issue if the eventual goal is a transition anyway (which it must be for them to be given). As fully transitioned people can't conceive naturally. It's a good tradeoff.

Suicide here in Europe is not higher (in fact it's higher when not carried out die to dysphoria) but I can imagine that in strongly conservative areas bullying is very strong driving people over the edge :'(

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by Hnrobert42 on Monday September 25, 2023 @05:18PM (#37650796)
That does indeed sound very frustrating. I have consciously chosen to not have children specifically because being a parent seems so difficult.

So while I sympathize with your plight, you chose this bed. Why should I have to sleep in it?

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by sneed_chucker on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @01:02PM (#37662351)
Maybe because the fact that a (presumably) healthy adult such as yourself chooses not to procreate because it "seems so difficult" indicates that there is something very sick about the society that we live in.
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by olliej on Monday September 25, 2023 @05:38PM (#37651059)
Ok, so people have had "child sexuality" since forever. Every time some person is talking about a kid's boyfriend or girlfriend they're talking about child sexuality.

The only change is that now we recognize that bullying and abusing children because they're the "wrong" sexuality is wrong, and homophobes have decided that instead of doing it directly they're going to try the "sex is sin" path of abuse and then say that the only reason for a non-straight relationship is sex, and therefore is adults only.

The fact that you go on an uninformed transphobic rant tells me which camp you're in.

Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by onetimeusename on Monday September 25, 2023 @01:02PM (#37647096)
Nothing in this article suggested any of the groups or individuals involved were far-right
Re:‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for C... by standardUser on Monday September 25, 2023 @02:24PM (#37648347)
The comment I responded to was specifically speculating about who was responsible for billboards they saw that relate to the topic of the article. Incidentally, the responses to my comment are indicative of exactly the kind of rhetoric I have seen many times coming from the right on this topic.