News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by stavros on Saturday August 05, 2023 @08:39AM (#37011425)
> It's hard to imagine how this could be faked short of digital manipulation

So, it's easy to imagine how this could be faked.

Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by semajian on Saturday August 05, 2023 @08:41AM (#37011438)
Well, yes
Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by stavros on Saturday August 05, 2023 @08:43AM (#37011457)
I'm holding a small basket until one of the reputable labs reproduces this. Anonymous videos on Twitter are a bit too anonymous for me.
Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by marcosdumay on Saturday August 05, 2023 @11:37AM (#37013067)
I guess the point is, it can be a fabrication, it can be something very important, and it can't really be anything in between.
Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by ncr100 on Saturday August 05, 2023 @11:48AM (#37013188)
Alternatively, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbon is discussed in the Twitter thread by the OP as a possible explanation of "not superconductivity" . . .
Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by cthalupa on Saturday August 05, 2023 @01:17PM (#37014255)
Not an expert, but my understanding is that magnet configuration could not create a stable levitation for pyrolytic graphite - you need an array of magnets, e.g. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1010/1010.5761.pdf

Doing a quick sanity check on youtube videos, every example I can find of it levitating involves use of magnet arrays as well.

Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by ynniv on Saturday August 05, 2023 @12:26PM (#37013624)
It can easily be faked, using a technique that would destroy the poster's career. It's one thing to not do something to the letter, and another to commit blatant fraud. Most career academics would not burn their career for the lulz.
Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by stavros on Saturday August 05, 2023 @12:28PM (#37013643)
It's an anonymous video.
Re:Flux Pinning in sample of LK-99 by throwawaymaths on Saturday August 05, 2023 @07:56PM (#37017475)
I think it would be tough for a lay scientist to go from 0 media expertise to faking it this quickly.