> Either they're lying/exaggerating

Or mistaken, or they're accurately reporting what someone else told them, who was lying/exaggerating/mistaken.

Here is the question and answer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ7Dw-739VY&t=7626s

Grusch states they have "biologics" that are "non-human" based on people he talked to

> based on people he talked to

So it's a complete nothing burger.

I guess, if you completely ignore what's been said through this hearing.

There's a reason hearsay evidence is not accepted in courts.

Yeah, technically he could say what he did if they pulled a vial of terrestrial pond scum or a goldfish out of the craft. She should have followed up, not with 'non-human', but with 'non-terrestrial'.

I think aliens exist, just not on earth. There's too much out there for this not to be true.

Our first encounter with extraterrestrial life will probably be microbes, exciting but not exactly little green men from X-Files.

Yep, would probably be the dawn of a new era if proven to be true publicly.

I know, right? Artificial intelligence, Aliens, and.... what would complete the trifecta?

(Please don't say Armageddon!)

The year of the Linux desktop?

The only thing more unbelievable than aliens, I am afraid

Could be Armageddon. Maybe they want a new vacation home and they are prepping the battlefield and doing some recon.