You have said what you think isn’t valid or good and seeing something you value would be interesting.
In other words, they're propaganda. At least in the case of graffiti with social commentary, anybody can go out there and put their message up. Murals with social messages are propaganda sanctioned by the property owner, or even commissioned by the government, making it establishmentarian propaganda that pretends to be transgression by adopting the superficial form of unsanctioned graffiti. Such murals are tacky and inauthentic; scrawled gang signs have more soul.
Might as well cancel the law and put up Wal-mart signs.
This may be a case where you spend so much time trying to be contrarian and not asking "Would getting what I want actually improve anything in the world".
I think a mural could be part of a propaganda campaign, but I don't think by themselves they merit the categorization.
Graffiti is individual speech, murals commissioned by the local government to glorify itself are not.