News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by kencausey on Sunday July 02, 2023 @01:56PM (#36563851)
I'm not sure why this was posted. Perhaps it was due to recent blogging by Nick Pelling on the subject at https://www.ciphermysteries.com/ ? There are quite a few entries now over a period of months that started from a reported cipher at Roswell.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by Magi604 on Sunday July 02, 2023 @03:44PM (#36564951)
I'm seeing an uptick of public interest in UFOs in my channels. I'm guessing it was sparked by Tucker Carlson talking about UFO coverups during one of his recent Twitter shows.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by Loughla on Sunday July 02, 2023 @05:22PM (#36565911)
Why is the cynic in me absolutely sure all the UFO coverage and news and Senate things are just a way to get more funding for the space force?
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by kjkjadksj on Sunday July 02, 2023 @06:55PM (#36566662)
DOD has no issue securing funds no matter what they are squawking about in congress. For example, they ran a secret war in Cambodia during the Vietnam war that only came to light after a leak. I imagine there are probably hundreds or thousands of such campaigns we will never learn of.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by lockhouse on Sunday July 02, 2023 @10:41PM (#36568091)
I think it is more likely that they are trying to divert our attention from something.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by King-Aaron on Monday July 03, 2023 @01:00AM (#36569085)
Lol they don't need to ask for funding for the military, they just get it.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by zgluck on Sunday July 02, 2023 @05:26PM (#36565934)
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by kencausey on Sunday July 02, 2023 @05:57PM (#36566219)
I didn't mean that it shouldn't have been posted. I really meant to say something like 'why this was posted now.'
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by lloydatkinson on Sunday July 02, 2023 @02:07PM (#36563961)
Such a weird phenomenon. Hard to say if they were UFOs seen through the eyes of the 1800s.

Then on the other hand I find the classic “they wouldn’t have been able to understand what they saw” theory unlikely because an airship made of shiny metal or something else would have been distinguishable.

Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by photonerd on Sunday July 02, 2023 @03:31PM (#36564824)
Honestly sounds like it was a hydrogen airship & some flights of fancy by the—not known for their intellectual rigor—local writers
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by Tanoc on Sunday July 02, 2023 @04:27PM (#36565322)
The "flapping fins" and "two great mugs thrust out from each side" certainly seem like ailerons and ballast. And the mentions of it going at "a great rate of speed" sound like what happens to dirigibles when they get caught broadside in side drafts. What's interesting is the mention of a metal prow. Later dirigibles had docking tips and lightning rods on their noses, but a metal prow seems like it would cause a lot of issues with center of lift. My only guess is it was some kind of lifting surface and the entire craft was an aerostat and not a true lighter-than-air craft.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by kjkjadksj on Sunday July 02, 2023 @06:58PM (#36566686)
The great speed referred to for some in this article was estimated at 250mph. For someone in 1897 that might have just been shorthand for incomprehensibly fast. These accounts feel a lot more similar to the navy pilot accounts of the pill/cigar shaped craft they’ve been tracking, which are also capable of a rapid change in speed along a new vector.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by photonerd on Sunday July 02, 2023 @08:12PM (#36567184)
I mean… they sound vaguely similar. Mostly though that’s because they’re both describing unknown airships moving in unexpected ways.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by gunapologist99 on Sunday July 02, 2023 @04:53PM (#36565612)
Or a bunch of hot air... in an enclosed space..
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by qwertyuiop_ on Sunday July 02, 2023 @03:30PM (#36564815)
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by rintakumpu on Sunday July 02, 2023 @05:48PM (#36566145)
Chums of Chance.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by pram on Sunday July 02, 2023 @11:27PM (#36568391)
I wonder if this was a part of the inspiration for Columbia in Bioshock Infinite?
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by deafpolygon on Sunday July 02, 2023 @11:38PM (#36568463)
Time travelers.
Re:The Mysterious Airships of 1896-97 (2014) by doodlebugging on Monday July 03, 2023 @02:18AM (#36569485)
I'm inclined to believe that these accounts are true stories of something that real people reported seeing for a long period of time before the end of the 19th century and that this airship flight would be the first successful contraption to fly under its own power while transporting men. I'm working on figuring out how to support that conclusion. LOL. Wish me luck as I think all the participants are history. Luckily I love history.