News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by jasonlotito on Friday June 30, 2023 @11:54AM (#36537245)
> I still cannot understand why I paid to get a specific streaming service (Sportsnet) and had to sit through Wayne Gretzsky ruining his legacy by selling sports gambling to my 3 children.

Why did they do it?

Money.

They wanted more money and you wouldn't stop watching your sport.

It's not a surprise. If given the option, people will actively shop to get the best bang for their buck. Given two options, they will opt for the one that gets them the most of what they value.

Why did you do it?

Because you valued your viewing habits over other things.

It's all really simple.

Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by paulddraper on Friday June 30, 2023 @02:51PM (#36540248)
How much do I have to pay them to not?
Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by joeythedolphin on Friday June 30, 2023 @03:29PM (#36540858)
I had to turn off the sports. Used to love NHL (and TV), but it was not worth the dark destructive undercurrent in my life. It really robbed me of happiness and potential. It became much easier just to turn hockey off. If a service does not have an ad-free version, it is simply not available to me.
Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by jbm on Friday June 30, 2023 @03:59PM (#36541322)
The irony is that, in Japan, the NHL offered a service with no advertising for a fair price.

I assume making a decent return off a large number of people is of less importance than fleecing true fans.

I used to think the Japanese baseball league was insanely commercial due to it using corporate sponsor names instead of the city name (Hanshin Tigers, Yomiuri Giants, etc..) but in retrospect, the commercialization was only skin deep while the NHL is completely and unapologetically corrupted.

Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by 8note on Friday June 30, 2023 @09:07PM (#36545078)
Local sports is a good option - to see it in person

Lesser leagues are more fun anyways

Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by mrguyorama on Friday June 30, 2023 @03:32PM (#36540907)
Stop paying them anything. Get everyone you can to stop paying them anything.

The transphobic fiasco with bud light made it pretty clear that boycotts WORK, if only we had the balls to do them, and maybe endure minuscule """suffering""" to continue them.

Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by teddyh on Friday June 30, 2023 @07:54PM (#36544325)
You can’t. To believe that everything has to have some sort of grass root, personal choice-based solution, is a fallacy¹. You could not boycott your way out of Standard Oil.

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36031458

Re:YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad ... by jbm on Friday June 30, 2023 @03:56PM (#36541264)
Actually I cancelled it after a month. I had moved from Tokyo back to Canada and didn't realize how far things had gone.

Your point stands in general.