News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by dumpsterdiver on Monday June 26, 2023 @06:27AM (#36477912)
> Something cannot both be a good investment and accessible to all.

Roads are a perfect example of a good investment that is accessible to all. It's called a "common good", and it exists.

Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by 8bp on Monday June 26, 2023 @09:49AM (#36479635)
Who's out here speculating on roads?
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by moffkalast on Monday June 26, 2023 @03:55PM (#36484950)
Nobody, and it should be the damn same with housing.
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by local_crmdgeon on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:37PM (#36485500)
ASTM, sovereign wealth funds, etc. Toll roads can be a pretty good investment.
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by beisner on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:02PM (#36485048)
OP means something more like "a security which appreciates on average faster than inflation", AKA an asset I can purchase and hold and sell later for more than I paid for it+improvements in real terms.
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by lukas099 on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:36PM (#36485485)
I think we should shoot for house prices increasing at exactly the inflation level (after a correction for current high prices of course). To me, this would be good enough to be considered a 'good investment', and wouldn't be unfair to future generations.
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by nsteel on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @06:54PM (#36499826)
The BoE desperately needs more knobs to control inflation, diversifying into house building is actually a great idea.
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by lukas099 on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @04:24PM (#36512078)
Do you think central banks should be given jurisdiction over fiscal policy? Historically, they have been limited to monetary policy, no?
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by dumpsterdiver on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @05:53AM (#36504362)
I don't mean to be a jerk, and this isn't directed at the parent poster, but when someone makes an argument that contains an unsound point that in a vacuum cannot hold up, that unsound point critically degrades the entire argument.

When someone includes statements in an argument that can be trivially disputed, they should fully expect those weak points to be disputed. The rest of the argument, imo, does not deserve critique until the trivially disputable points are resolved.

Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by bloqs on Saturday July 01, 2023 @07:29AM (#36548984)
I didn't make an unsound point, there was a misunderstanding by you. When talking about financial assets or investment, accessible means affordable, but affordable is a relative term, whereas somethings accessibility is a useful observation - "can working-class people buy one easily?"
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by scythe on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:05PM (#36485098)
I think the parent commenter meant "investment" in the narrow sense of "financial security" and not in the broader sense of any activity that generates a figurative return for the effort applied — in the case of roads, turning government action into economic activity.
Re:Why Britain Doesn’t Build by bloqs on Saturday July 01, 2023 @07:27AM (#36548963)
I mean in a financial sense. A good investment with a high guarantee of high return cannot also be financially accessible to all (read: affordable)