I thought it was helpful too, but read like it was written by AI. So I wanted to know if it was. What's wrong with asking a question?

Sarcasm is hard to detect in written form.

Not that hard /s

and also, if the summary was good, why would it matter whether it was written by an AI or not?

In your view, is the summary accurate and complete?

Because it's poorly written, poorly readable and misses things. It's essentially bot spam with a human clicking the submit button.

It's pretty good, but misses out that it's a Louis Rossmann video, who is a big spokesman for consumer rights against tech companies (also a very popular vlogger and highly skilled electronics tutor). I feel like an AI would be less likely to pick up on this wider context, but possibly the OP just didn't realise who it was.

It’s pretty obvious.

For the downvoters, if you can’t tell this is an AI you’re gonna be in real trouble if these models actually get good.

The giveaway for me was the sentence "While not excusing Amazon's actions, he questions whether enough vetting was done before canceling his account." It makes no sense - why would questioning whether enough vetting was done be interpretable by anyone as "excusing Amazon's actions"? It obviously goes in the other direction; the sentence might have read "While not directly condemning Amazon's actions, he questions whether enough vetting was done before canceling his account."