News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chat Notebooks by stabbles on Friday June 09, 2023 @05:15PM (#36264261)
Even if true it's unnecessary. I just can't read anything written by Wolfram without rolling my eyes
Re:Chat Notebooks by Frost1x on Friday June 09, 2023 @05:43PM (#36264568)
Of course it's unnecessary, but I suspect there's at least some substance to this claim. If it were anyone else, a harmless plug like this would be accepted by most, might even be an interesting nugget a reader would appreciate. The issue is the style of claim (being the originator) is dropped far more than it should be.

I'm personally a fan of many ideas Wolfram pushes, just not a fan of the style they're pushed. I'd say I'm not in the minority, to the point it's a tired cliche.

Re:Chat Notebooks by nmstoker on Friday June 09, 2023 @05:54PM (#36264706)
Likewise. Especially when it's liberally sprinkled with his catch phrase: "A new kind of..."

It's unfortunate as clearly he has a huge amount to contribute. Maybe with an LLM someone can build a de-Stepheniser that takes in his pompous, smug text and outputs something more mellow and reasonable whilst keeping all the facts, which is what we are there for after all.

Re:Chat Notebooks by zaps on Friday June 09, 2023 @07:14PM (#36265613)
A new kind of new kind
Re:Chat Notebooks by akiselev on Friday June 09, 2023 @09:38PM (#36266684)
Not even typeclasses are safe from Wolfram!
Re:Chat Notebooks by mnky9800n on Friday June 09, 2023 @06:24PM (#36265090)
The only reasonable response
Re:Chat Notebooks by bookofjoe on Friday June 09, 2023 @07:10PM (#36265573)
"Only the great are permitted great faults."β€”La Rochefoucauld