Re:Chat Notebooks
by stabbles on Friday June 09, 2023 @05:15PM
(#36264261)
Even if true it's unnecessary. I just can't read anything written by Wolfram without rolling my eyes
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Of course it's unnecessary, but I suspect there's at least some substance to this claim. If it were anyone else, a harmless plug like this would be accepted by most, might even be an interesting nugget a reader would appreciate. The issue is the style of claim (being the originator) is dropped far more than it should be.
I'm personally a fan of many ideas Wolfram pushes, just not a fan of the style they're pushed. I'd say I'm not in the minority, to the point it's a tired cliche.
Likewise. Especially when it's liberally sprinkled with his catch phrase:
"A new kind of..."
It's unfortunate as clearly he has a huge amount to contribute. Maybe with an LLM someone can build a de-Stepheniser that takes in his pompous, smug text and outputs something more mellow and reasonable whilst keeping all the facts, which is what we are there for after all.
A new kind of new kind
Not even typeclasses are safe from Wolfram!
The only reasonable response