Classic components could be replaced by rubber in next-gen loudspeakers

Re:Classic components could be replaced by rubber in next-ge... by dylan604 on Saturday June 03, 2023 @09:08PM (#36182047)

For one, studio monitors are typically near-field speakers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Classic components could be replaced by rubber in next-ge... by Blackthorn on Saturday June 03, 2023 @10:24PM (#36182458)

"near field speaker" is a marketing term that has no meaning.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Classic components could be replaced by rubber in next-ge... by pseudosaid on Sunday June 04, 2023 @01:48AM (#36183386)

thats not true. A near-field speaker tends to be a speaker that performs well at closer distances. its obviously implied given its prefix.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_monitor

You dont know what you are talking about. “has no meaning” is such a nothing sandwich,

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Classic components could be replaced by rubber in next-ge... by Blackthorn on Sunday June 04, 2023 @09:55AM (#36185635)

Near field is a property of the space, not the speaker. Would suggest reading https://digistar.cl/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=547

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Classic components could be replaced by rubber in next-ge... by smolder on Sunday June 04, 2023 @02:02PM (#36187827)

You're right that it's about a space, or a field, which is in the name, but you're wrong in contradicting the other poster. The near field is determined by the radiating surface, the front baffle of the speaker. Room height line arrays for example have a large near field. Near field speakers are those with tuning designed to be flattest when listened to inside the near field. The link you posted is confused and misleading, which is unfortunate since they dressed it up as some kind of "myth busting".

[ Parent | on HN ]