News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by NickC25 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @12:05PM (#36153142)
All for it.

LSD and other similar substances can offer an incredible insight to people who are equipped to handle it. Such substances create new pathways in your brain and increase neuroplasticity.

It's not the one-stop solution to everyone's problems and should NOT be treated as such (far from it!), but it does offer tremendous perspective and insight to those who know what they're getting into.

[dead]
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by skyyler on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:22PM (#36154356)
Can you restate your position in a way that doesn't seem to be a battle in the ongoing Culture War?
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by quickthrowman on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:22PM (#36154371)
> Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. That tramples curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

You can argue that psychedelics are unsafe without resorting to bringing up ideological COVID culture war stuff.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by vorpalhex on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:43PM (#36154675)
One of the issues is that LSD also simulates the feeling of insight. How many trip reports mention "finding the solution to everyone's problems" and "forgetting" it upon sobering? (They didn't forget, they never had it, the LSD simulated having it...)

Maybe it's a better cultural value for our truth seeking groups to avoid psychedelics and other hallucinogens.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by ethanbond on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:22PM (#36155189)
I’ve never read any trip report including a claim like that.

Lots of people claim to have solved a problem they have, and some of these solutions end up being forgotten, bad, or authentically and positively life-changing.

Hard to draw conclusions from this landscape (which is why scientists should be experimenting with them).

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by robbiep on Thursday June 01, 2023 @10:33PM (#36160149)
You've never taken a psychedelic and felt you understood the meaning of life? I have personally solved all major conflicts and the middle east crisis multiple times. None of it stuck though...

With some technical problems I have certainly felt that I have solved them and come out with nothing but undecipherable scribble at the end. Once or twice something useful in the afterglow, but much of it is lost (or was never real to begin with)

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by sitkack on Friday June 02, 2023 @12:07AM (#36160912)
The whole world should drop acid for 72 hours. Then I think the major conflicts will have evaporated.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by ethanbond on Friday June 02, 2023 @09:36AM (#36164866)
“Understood the meaning of life” != solved everyone’s problems

Did you actually feel that you had solved all major conflicts, or are you 1) parodying your own ambition of insight or 2) making the separate claim that “if the primary agents in the conflict could have the experience that I’m having, they maybe would not be so conflicted?”

(2) for example is a much, much more believable claim than “I solved all the problems” despite their superficial similarity.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by robbiep on Sunday June 04, 2023 @12:26AM (#36183097)
You didn’t give a numerical option for having personally solved all the world’s problems, but I’ll call it 0), and I felt 0) but am also claiming 1). Others have made 2) but that wasn’t part of my comment.

I’m not really interested in what you believe, it’s clear you haven’t had psychedelic experiences, which is fine, but it’s a bit rich for you to be claiming what I could have experienced if you’ve never had your wetwear run that particular program. Psychedelic experiences are unbelievable by their very nature. At their worst (as was repeated elsewhere in the thread, and actually in the article as well) you are literally entering the state of a schizophrenic. It isn’t very nice.

And at its best you can think that you have deep insight into major world problems, the cause of conflicts and how to solve them.

In a more personal middle ground it can also be a highly fertile environment for self reflection and introspection with lasting benefits

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by joenot443 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:05PM (#36154968)
In my experience, the "simulated insight" (and I agree, that is roughly what I'd call it) ends up being something more attune to "I need to take better care of my apartment" or "Revolver truly is their best album" or more recently, "I need to learn to write shaders." The insights one experiences are personal, whether or not they're actually beneficial to the waking self.

I haven't met anyone who's seriously felt they'd "discovered" or solved anything serious while tripping. I know people who've left relationships or changed career paths, so as with nearly anything psychoactive, YMMV.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by chaps on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:47PM (#36154734)
Have you ever done psychedelics?
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by nathan_compton on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:54PM (#36154838)
I've done psychedelics of many types and I find the so-called "insights" they offer to be banal in the extreme.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by chaps on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:58PM (#36154886)
Not exactly going to disagree with you there. Just felt it was an important question to ask considering the rigidity of their comment.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by nathan_compton on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:08PM (#36155020)
I'm not the original reply, by the way. I think psychedelics can be fun and extremely liberating/relaxing. But they have not given me any significant personal, scientific, literary or other insights.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by grugagag on Thursday June 01, 2023 @05:06PM (#36157337)
I find that whatever insights, they’re personal. But their general effect humbling our egos. I find that to be of great use in a selfish narcissistic society we’re living in. I remember after having an LSD trip with good personal insights I got home and had cathartic session of sobbing. It felt absolutely great to do something I rarely do. Last time I did this was more than 15 years ago and feel that I’m still drawing some essence from this experience. Perhaps if I find myself stuck or at crossroads I’ll give it another go.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by _a_a_a_ on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:51PM (#36154794)
Pls post (say) 3 examples of <<"finding the solution to everyone's problems" and "forgetting" it upon sobering?>>

I'm only aware of it happening a NOx trip in the 1800's

> Maybe it's a better cultural value for our truth seeking groups to avoid psychedelics and other hallucinogens

So. You're afraid of them then. Otherwise you'd post some actual evidence.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by NickC25 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:57PM (#36154879)
It's important to have an experienced tripper with you so that when you have a solution, someone can write it down if you're unable to. Or a voice reorder, or some way of capturing your insight.

Has worked every time for me.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by quickthrowman on Thursday June 01, 2023 @05:15PM (#36157437)
Yes, I have taken LSD many times and there’s always a feeling of a deeper understanding of everything, how everything is connected, how to solve problems, etc. After coming down and examining the thoughts I had while tripping, none of my thoughts are actually insightful or profound at all, LSD just makes it seem like they are.

Still, I really enjoy that feeling, along with the visual and auditory effects of LSD and enjoy taking it a couple times a year.

Perhaps the experiences that others have had spark true insight, but not in my experience.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by galleywest200 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @06:09PM (#36158082)
I am not sure if LSD use in college gave me any real insights, but it did leave me with a permanent recognition of my internal thought processes. Becoming acutely aware of them essentially. Instead of two layers (internal thoughts then observed reality) there were three (myself, internal thoughts, then observed reality).
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by rainclouds on Thursday June 01, 2023 @06:35PM (#36158370)
Spot on. My ability to separate myself from an issue and view it as a 3rd party came around this.

Sometimes you had separate yourself pretty far from something to be able absorb and understand an issue, and LSD can cause that space.

I see the space, the separating, as the benefit. Gave new prospective.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by pengaru on Thursday June 01, 2023 @07:01PM (#36158616)
> One of the issues is that LSD also simulates the feeling of insight. How many trip reports mention "finding the solution to everyone's problems" and "forgetting" it upon sobering? (They didn't forget, they never had it, the LSD simulated having it...)

Are you sure you're not confusing LSD with THC? What you're describing is well known as "stoner epiphanies"...

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by erur on Thursday June 01, 2023 @08:46PM (#36159418)
Totally agree when it comes to "general insights" here. You're probably not gonna solve any major problems even though it feels like it in the moment.

However, imho. altering the thought process through drugs and really introspecting on what changes and how that relates to the sober state can yield a LOT of valuable learnings.

I feel like I learned a lot about myself just by introspecting on the effects alcohol, THC, etc. had on me. Really gave me some insights on how associations are formed, what euphoria does to decision making and so on.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by klyrs on Thursday June 01, 2023 @10:46PM (#36160240)
Fwiw I've overcome obstacles on LSD -- "run the algorithm backwards!" Nothing I couldn't have come up with sober, but I hadn't done so in several days.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by malux85 on Friday June 02, 2023 @12:03AM (#36160885)
I can’t quote any enormous studies but I can give you my own experience.

I use it once every month or so, and while I’m on it I did the following:

Built a triangular arbitrage DeFi trading system that made me 200k

Sped up a face recognition system to from 16,000faces a second to 1.2M faces a second

Created the first version of my nudged elastic band simulator for finding transition state energy

Learnt GPU shader coding and made my first real-time atomic force simulator

All of this while high on LSD, not having the idea and implementing later, but having the idea and then implementing while high,

I do a lot of coding while normal too, but LSD seems to remove all self doubt and makes me come up with creative solutions much much much faster, it’s not a simulation, I am objectively better while using it.

It has downsides too though, usually the day after I am more tired than usual and need a day to just rest, and it doesn't always work, sometimes while on it I just feel like chilling and reading, it's not something that can be forced

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by BasedAnon on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:17PM (#36155127)
and it can also be a one-way ticket to schizoville
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by amanaplanacanal on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:35PM (#36155394)
Unfortunately, for people who are predisposed, going away to college or falling in love can also trigger a psychotic break. I don't think we would tell people not to do those things though.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by BasedAnon on Thursday June 01, 2023 @03:01PM (#36155780)
This is like equating swimming in the middle of the atlantic with swimming at your local leisure center.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by NoImmatureAdHom on Thursday June 01, 2023 @10:49PM (#36160269)
You can't make a meaningful comparison without numbers, so I'm not sure where you get your confidence. As it happens, my intuition is that your comparison is wrong.

I would bet that people who are predisposed to e.g. schizophrenia are, for the most part, going to experience some insult that makes it come on at some point before 30 years old. It's just a question of when, where, what, but it'll happen.

I bet the group of people who could develop schizophrenia were they to experience the right insult, but don't, is very small.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by BasedAnon on Friday June 02, 2023 @03:40PM (#36169848)
>You can't make a meaningful comparison without numbers

Except that these numbers do exist and it's a well documented phenomenon.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by maribi on Monday June 05, 2023 @02:53AM (#36193252)
I don't know, personally I believe that a person can be genuinely afraid of water, I had it, I was generally even afraid to go into knee-deep water. So I'm 100% sure there is such a thing. Fortunately, the swimming school https://3sswim.co.uk/prices/ helped me get rid of this phobia, now I enjoy swimming, I think that in general, this was my goal
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by NickC25 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:22PM (#36155191)
When not done under proper set & setting, yeah.

If you're around people you trust, in a controlled environment, you're not likely to develop schizophrenia.

If you just decide randomly to trip in an unknown environment with people you're not comfortable around, yeah, it's going to be a wild ride and you might not ever truly get off it even after the stuff wears off completely.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by seabird on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:34PM (#36155372)
Things can just go bad, no matter how hard you try. There is always some level of risk involved, especially if you have a family or personal history of mental illness, in which case it's advisable to not fuck with it at all. "Set and setting" doesn't paper over everything.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by aaomidi on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:36PM (#36155410)
Isn’t this generally the case for everything?

Things can go bad in any experience.

You can go zip lining and things can go bad. You can go through any experience and can be left with various degrees of physical and mental damage.

Does that mean we shouldn’t do anything?

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by BasedAnon on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:59PM (#36155759)
Risks are not created equal.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by aaomidi on Thursday June 01, 2023 @03:18PM (#36156014)
Never implied they are but neither are the rewards.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by seabird on Thursday June 01, 2023 @04:28PM (#36156923)
The risk of psychedelic drugs is more comparable to motorsports, the more involved action sports, heavy equipment operation, etc. and your average person would be very wary of participating in these even though there are plenty of risk mitigations for these activities.

I'm not saying you shouldn't do drugs. I'm saying that many of them require way more respect than most people realize they need to give them, and trying to downplay that is not good. I can tell you from personal experience that it's easy to get yourself and people you care about in dangerous places.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by chrisldgk on Thursday June 01, 2023 @05:16PM (#36157450)
Speak for yourself, I’d hop into (and probably crash) a formula 1 car no questions asked
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by seabird on Thursday June 01, 2023 @05:33PM (#36157665)
I would to, but most people get nervous revving their car past 4k.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by hellotomyrars on Thursday June 01, 2023 @06:30PM (#36158308)
To be fair it’s not a good comparison. An F1 car is , all things considered, an incredibly safe place to be in.

Certainly safer than your average road car in most circumstances.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by aaomidi on Thursday June 01, 2023 @08:00PM (#36159141)
Then maybe we should focus on the education around this instead of prohibition.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by NoImmatureAdHom on Thursday June 01, 2023 @10:44PM (#36160231)
> The risk of psychedelic drugs is more comparable to motorsports, the more involved action sports, heavy equipment operation, etc.

Yeah...I'm going to need to see some numbers to believe that.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by BasedAnon on Thursday June 01, 2023 @02:58PM (#36155744)
> When not done under proper set & setting, yeah.

Sorry but this is the biggest load of garbage. You can do everything right, and still come away with trauma and psych issues. It's like writing randomly to memory from ring 0 and hoping you don't irreversibly wreck your install.

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by NoImmatureAdHom on Thursday June 01, 2023 @10:51PM (#36160281)
> You can do everything right, and still come away with trauma and psych issues

Yes, but the question is: how likely are "trauma & psych issues"? How dangerous is the drug in comparison to going out and having six drinks over the course of the night, or (if you do LSD say once a year) a year's worth of drinking? Or, how about in comparison to living somewhere that means you need to drive to work every weekday?

Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by BasedAnon on Friday June 02, 2023 @03:41PM (#36169862)
This presumes I think drinking is better, I don't, in fact I would probably argue LSD is a less harmful drug on the whole compared to alcohol.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by NoImmatureAdHom on Saturday June 03, 2023 @08:03AM (#36175934)
Yeah sorry, I don't mean to presume. I just mean that you need to know the magnitude and have comparisons to really have a meaningful opinion.
Re:Why Scientists Need to Get High by YeGoblynQueenne on Friday June 02, 2023 @05:49AM (#36163141)
"set & setting" is mainly a convenient red herring to switch off any curious inquiry about the risks from psychedelics. It goes like this:

-- My friend took drug X and he had an accident!

-- Set & setting?

In other words, we don't care about your friend and his accident, we're just trying to counter any suggestions that he had an accident because of drug X. It was his fault for choosing the wrong set & setting.

Which should tell you all you need to know about the "communities" that form around those substances. People ready to blame each other for whatever happens to them just in case their favourite drug gets a bad name. What a community.