Re:Churchill’s Famine: The killing of three million is a sto...
by jvanderbot on Sunday May 28, 2023 @09:53AM
(#36104000)
You would. Of course. But not necessarily because of western rule causing famine, perhaps because of improved record keeping. Just looking at the spans in GP comment, it seems the gaps are getting shorter.
Re:Churchill’s Famine: The killing of three million is a sto...
by Waterluvian on Sunday May 28, 2023 @09:58AM
(#36104039)
Great point. I feel like statistics could have been so much more fun in school had I really embraced the joy of mystery solving.
Re:Churchill’s Famine: The killing of three million is a sto...
by dmix on Sunday May 28, 2023 @09:56AM
(#36104017)
That's a good point, we probably only know most of the really bad ones or historically relevant ones. Just like volcano eruptions.
Re:Churchill’s Famine: The killing of three million is a sto...
by ralfd on Sunday May 28, 2023 @10:59AM
(#36104572)
My guess would be ramping up population growth. Any wealth created by colonial rule, and British technology / peace / medicine, would be turned into more people surviving into adulthood.
Re:Churchill’s Famine: The killing of three million is a sto...
by polygamous_bat on Sunday May 28, 2023 @04:44PM
(#36107609)
> Any wealth created by colonial rule, and British technology / peace / medicine, would be turned into more people surviving into adulthood.
As opposed to, what? The destitution that comes with independence? It seems to suggest the colonized people were savages killing each other before the British stopped by so generously.
I’m curious to explore this when I’m back at a PC.