Im 100% sure I never activated XP, installed through the famous FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8 quoted before.

And back in the days, as a teenager, I typed "format c:" every week-end ;)

Maybe it's the later builds that need activation ?

The leaked keys were blacklisted down the line. Online and phone activation didn't work for them anymore. They regularly updated their list of banned keys as well.

Activation became a hard requirement further down the line, I think the process got more strict during one of the service pack upgrades.

It's possible your installs were all automatically activated over the internet. I think the hardware ID and the serial number were some kind of combined identifier and if your computer(s) were part of "the good list", your fingerprint may have been whitelisted so that automatic online activation never caused a problem.

Only Home needed activation and AFAIK some OEM versions didn't either.

XP Pro/Enterprise did not.

Might have been a volume license that doesn't need activation or a cracked installation CD.

Thanks guys for the explanation :) Make sense.

Activation was delivered as an optional "feature" that would be installed alongside all the other Windows updates, unless you opted out of it (or it was already slipstreamed into the install disk).

From what I remember this was pushed around the time of SP2, but if you had a launch-day install disk and reformatted your disk that often then you probably never got as far as receiving that update.

Only XP Home required this.

XP Pro did not need online activation.

That's likely why some people are saying they never had to do it.

I remember a week spent working on a corporate helpdesk in 2004 when phoning up to activate windows was a thing. I think it was the volume license key that didn't need activation -- the one we used in the "gold masters". For some laptops which were off to places where the corporate network didn't reach, they had retail xp profiessional installed.

I am sorry you are correct and I was mistaken.

You're clearly not chatgpt then!

This morning it confidently told me that BFD packets from a cisco IOS device would be tagged EF. I asked if it were sure it wasn't CS6, then it apologised and said it was CS6. Then I asked if it was sure it wasn't AF31 and it agreed it was AF31.