Can you cite a medical study that evaluates the accuracy of your smart watch’s assessment of your quality of sleep?
Preferably one not sponsored by the manufacturer?
>Oura ring was 96% accurate in detecting sleep compared to polysomnography, 48% accurate in detecting wakefulness, 65% agreement in detecting “light sleep,” 51% agreement in detecting “deep sleep” and 61% agreement in detecting REM
So it's basically wrong with sleep categorization about half the time.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120339/
Most devices (Fatigue Science Readiband, Fitbit Alta HR, EarlySense Live, ResMed S+, SleepScore Max) performed as well as or better than actigraphy on sleep/wake performance measures, while the Garmin devices performed worse.
Seems to accurately analyze them. Conclusion "Device sleep stage assessments were inconsistent."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120339/
This research was funded by the Office of Naval Research, Code 34. (see also Disclosure Statement)
Great news.
Also, is there a more "layman readable" version of this paper/report?
I don't like wearing (and don't wear) watches or any kind of bands/rings/etc at all - they feel like a constant weight and then there's sweat, and pressure, and all that.
My oura ring has been far more helpful in identifying patterns leading to less quality sleep. For example , by highlighting elevated resting heart rates and asking me if I ate later that night, consumed spicy foods or alcohol, etc. That said, it’s not terribly durable. After a couple years it refused to accept firmware updates. Then a few weeks ago (after maybe 3 years of use) it stopped connecting to the app altogether and support tickets are going unanswered. This is greatly disappointing but I may spring for a replacement anyway because of how helpful it’s been in correlating lifestyle choices to sleep parameters (& quite consistently so).