Probably best to nip "shadow IT" in the bud with an easy-to-use approved internal ChatGPT connection, rather than hoping that employees don't try make use of the tool surreptitiously.

Samsung may attempt to ban use of the tool for their employees because they're worried about loss of internal data, but when the tool hugely reduces the workload of those employees, they'll find a way to use it anyways.

they will use the azure services.

You mean Azure OpenAI Service with the ChatGPT (preview) enabled [1]? We've been using it for a couple months now; it's lovely.

1. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/o...

Probably, does it have a GUI on its own, or is this something every company needs to implement themselves?

The service has a Studio[1] where users can utilize the Chat capabilities. Our understanding (and approach) has been to utilize this to curate and train the GTP models and capabilities and then expose those to the wider org via other, already utilized UI (like MS Teams).

1. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/o...

I am looking into open sourcing a PWA ChatGPT client for this. But I am not certain how to handle authentication without a backend or each user needing to add their OpenAI key

I am also working on a similar solution. How far did you get?

Just curious, what's the penalty if it is used for training or other things (purposely or accidentally)?

how to do they use the data for training? Will my questions about the optimal shape of a dildo be remembered forever?

"As an AI language model, I am prohibited from instructing you to fuck yourself."

Just rolled it out internally at our company as well. It’s nice to have access to GPT-4 without having to pay for it myself (those queries and responses get pricey if you use it a lot).

Super helpful for boilerplate code. Right now, we have a limit of 500 tokens though, so it somewhat limits asking more complex questions.

Interestingly, our internal team supporting it has added a ton of initial prompts depending on what vertical of our business you want to ask about. Kind of neat, as I haven’t tried to get the AI to pretend to be something else as of yet.

(Because I mostly just ask it to write various things to the tune of the “Fresh Prince of Bel Air”)

How did you get access to GPT4? Were you guys already using the 3.5 model and get upgraded at some point?

I actually don’t know. We just rolled out access to LLMs internally for the first time within the last week and both models were present when I was granted access.

> Just rolled it out internally at our company as well. It’s nice to have access to GPT-4 without having to pay for it myself (those queries and responses get pricey if you use it a lot).

When you say use it a lot do you mean typing in queries yourself or programatically and/or recursively generating prompts like autogpt?

Because I thought one day I had used it a lot by typing in lots of messages. The next day my usage was less than a few dollars.

How would you recognize if they use your data?

Exactly, can your lawyer or legal department ask for documented proof that you did not contribute to training data?

The same way you would recognize if Google was selling your GSuite data or Msft was selling your Office data.

This would be exact quotes, in an LLM model this harder to recognize.

You can hardly see from the pictures AI if your picture is part of the model.

So what you're saying is if you use any cloud provider they could be training their AI with your data and you'll never know...

Aren't you still just trusting that they won't "accidentally leak" all that data to OpenAI for training?