News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by davely on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @12:06PM (#35789732)
Just rolled it out internally at our company as well. It’s nice to have access to GPT-4 without having to pay for it myself (those queries and responses get pricey if you use it a lot).

Super helpful for boilerplate code. Right now, we have a limit of 500 tokens though, so it somewhat limits asking more complex questions.

Interestingly, our internal team supporting it has added a ton of initial prompts depending on what vertical of our business you want to ask about. Kind of neat, as I haven’t tried to get the AI to pretend to be something else as of yet.

(Because I mostly just ask it to write various things to the tune of the “Fresh Prince of Bel Air”)

Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by subroutine on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @08:40PM (#35796255)
How did you get access to GPT4? Were you guys already using the 3.5 model and get upgraded at some point?
Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by davely on Wednesday May 03, 2023 @02:22AM (#35798712)
I actually don’t know. We just rolled out access to LLMs internally for the first time within the last week and both models were present when I was granted access.
Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by ParetoOptimal on Wednesday May 03, 2023 @10:00AM (#35802505)
> Just rolled it out internally at our company as well. It’s nice to have access to GPT-4 without having to pay for it myself (those queries and responses get pricey if you use it a lot).

When you say use it a lot do you mean typing in queries yourself or programatically and/or recursively generating prompts like autogpt?

Because I thought one day I had used it a lot by typing in lots of messages. The next day my usage was less than a few dollars.