In the future, this extends to robots, of course.
No need to shuffle them around, you can combine different finetunes in one composition.
I am very dissatisfied with current diagnosis analysis, as they are often wrong, as well.
I really don't want an AI make medical decisions for me, but doctors are overworked and if AI can help spot things, they otherwise would have missed, then I really hope those tools won't be blocked for legal reasons.
The danger I see is that you become to relient on it. There is a great science fiction book (forgot the name!) where everyone forgot how things worked (and didn’t need to know!) because machines did all the work. It created this dystopia where people where immensely shallow and immature because all things just happened for them.
Are you sure, that wasn't just a ordinary newspaper? At least I get that feeling quite often.
There's also A Logic Named Joe, but that's more about ChatGPT sans RLHF.
One of my roles has been writing surgical edu content, and I’ve used OpenAI to output procedure descriptions. I’ve unfortunately found that they were 99% accurate and then jumbled some significant thing..
So if you’re, say working in a hospital in a specific role, you will be advised by an AI module for that specific system. Or if you are working in an OR with a specific surgical procedure every day, you will have an AI module active all day to augment your knowledge and deliver relevant information where it’s needed.
It’s going to make some types of work immensely satisfying.