News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by shadowgovt on Sunday April 23, 2023 @12:46PM (#35677864)
IIUC it's complicated.

Because the grid is, fundamentally, still storage-starved (though that's been improving in recent years), even with export the CA energy companies run into grid over-saturation problems on clear, sunny days. Eventually losses catch up with you pushing the power geographically far enough; they couldn't, for example, power the entire United States off of enough California solar.

So I naively suspect the issue is either exporting just saturates the adjacent grids too or other power companies are loathe to crash their prices by letting their grids saturate and therefore use whatever restrictions are allowed against exporting to keep CA's surplus off their grids.

Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by iso1631 on Sunday April 23, 2023 @03:23PM (#35679605)
Except the data seems to show that California Independent System Operator (CISO) has not had a single hour where Gas hasn't produced at least 1GWh of electricity, even in the height of the day in the height of summer with the lowest demand, not even close

Maybe there are local bottlenecks inside the CISO network, but that's a very separate problem.

Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by shadowgovt on Sunday April 23, 2023 @04:04PM (#35679954)
Interesting. That makes me wonder if the gas plants have to operate at some minimal output level because they can't go all the way into cold shutdown without risking grid integrity should something unexpected happen. Except that I was under the impression that gas-plants, in general, are bootstrappable plants and can kickstart themselves from a cold shutdown.
Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by namibj on Sunday April 23, 2023 @11:53PM (#35683485)
Not all are bootstrap-capable, and many do co-generation for district heating, which can power absorption heat pumps for cooling in the summer.

Also a gas turbine core that's spinning can modulate power in seconds, unlike one that has to first be brought up to speed with external power (even if that's from batteries, or an on-site diesel (like AFAIK in the case of the black start capability of the downtown power plant in Wuppertal Barmen)).

Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by Dylan16807 on Sunday April 23, 2023 @08:44PM (#35682349)
Ultra high voltage lines can reach all the way to the east coast with 10% losses and supposedly about 10 cents per kWh for construction and maintenance. And that's AC, which HVDC might beat.

So it seems to me like you could power the US off california solar if they had enough.

Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by nonethewiser on Sunday April 23, 2023 @10:32PM (#35683041)
That’s pretty incredible to think about. I didn’t think that was feasible.
Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by iso1631 on Monday April 24, 2023 @04:31AM (#35685027)
Brazil has two or three 1200 mile plus HVDC lines in operation

The longest curently runing line is over 2500km, which from Los Angeles would cover the entirety of 17 states as well as cities like Vancouver, Calgary and even Winnipeg

Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by cesarb on Monday April 24, 2023 @10:26AM (#35688069)
> Brazil has two or three 1200 mile plus HVDC lines in operation

There are four: Xingu-Estreito and Xingu-Rio for the Belo Monte dam, and the two parallel Rio Madeira lines for the Santo Antônio and Jirau dams on the Madeira river. They all take large amounts of hydroelectric power from the sparsely populated North region to the densely populated Southeast region. (There are also the two parallel Itaipu HVDC lines, but they're shorter than 1200 miles.)

Re:Lego breaks ground on first US manufacturing facility by iso1631 on Monday April 24, 2023 @04:21PM (#35692652)
> even with export the CA energy companies run into grid over-saturation problems on clear, sunny days

Which day, specifically, had zero natural gas generation?