Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by wahnfrieden on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @11:56AM
(#35526983)
It's simple profit motive. What you're asking for is something else
Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by petercooper on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @12:01PM
(#35527066)
I agree, but as 'Bill Gates' said on The Simpsons: "I didn't get rich by writing a lot of checks."
Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by xooglechoogle on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @12:27PM
(#35527449)
Easily justified as good marketing. This #1 post on HN will Google (in various ways) much more than the cash they could have used to look like good guys, even if it wasn't done out of goodness.
Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by petercooper on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @12:47PM
(#35527704)
Much more than the cash to handle potentially thousands of applicants who were in a similar position?
(Don't get me wrong, I do think large companies should be held to higher ethical standards, but we don't seem to be there yet.)
No mention of the relocation bonus. Was there one? Did they rescind that as well? Since I'm 90% sure Google would pay for international relocation, and the blog post didn't mention it (which it surely would have if Google had offered then rescinded one), I suspect he did get to keep that.
Those don't get paid in advance. They're paid as part of your paycheck.
Giving this person a small chunk of cash would make me respect Google so much more than just screwing this person's life up and saying "Whoops, you're fired, lol!"
But it's been a long time since Google was a cool company.