Putin by contrast is a return to a 19th century Tsardom in everything but name.
is that what gets taught in american schools these days? i wonder how the black and natives feel
> Putin by contrast is a return to a 19th century Tsardom in everything but name
what does tsardom mean? if anything putinism is a caricature of the russian government in Red Alert 2. by that i mean a mix of soviet and tsarist symbolism and orthodox church. its so bizzare
I will be labeled as a brainwashed ruskie and downvoted into oblivion if I point out that it isn't really true, right?
The conscription has not reached Ukraine's levels yet, but only because 2024 is not far away, and Putin expects to get his 75% without too much trouble. After that, who knows.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/21/whats-behind-pro-ru...
Let alone that it is public knowledge that the "separatists" are and always have been under russian control. Little green men came from russia and made the war happen.
"it is public knowledge"
I suggest you read Wikipedia about anti-Maidan unrest in the Eastern Ukraine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_pro-Russian_unrest_in_Ukr...
Any violation of Ukrainian internationally recognized borders has been highly illegal and no matter how much whitewashing you want to do you are shilling for genocide. Also you will remove any claim that it was putins war after Ukraine has won.
Pointing out random events 9 years ago somehow justifies mass murder of civilians now? Also you need to go that far back to find anything at all is quite telling.
Whats not clear about that?
You are confused. You claimed that the sole reason of the war in 2014 was Russian meddling and I suggested you read how the events really unfolded. It's still not too late to do just that.
the people in the eu largely support ukraine because they dislike russia. but no one sees them as our freedom fighters. lol. everyone knows the us is behind it and when living standards accross europe deteriorate people will lose patience with both the ukraine and the us
You think in one thread that russia had the best revolution in the history and in an another you call Ukrainian revolution illegal.
Also even if you don’t like that another country shakes lose of autocrat cronies, how does any of that justify tanks and bombs and Bucha?
Your thinking is comparable to a common thug: you were speeding, therefore I can kill all your relatives, rape your wife and kids.
read about the russian civil war for a historical lesson about what can happen when there is a revolution. not just the russian civil war, but the ukranian civil war that followed the bolshevik revolution, as well as the heroic ukranian figures like Nestor Makhno and other noble ukranians that faught for a free and independent ukraine. but for some reason the ukranian nationalists in charge today glorify the nazi Stepan Bandera and made themselves and ukraine a vassal of us imperial ambitions. this is not the ukraine i want to support
You mean leaving the people of the Crimea, DNR and LNR to the mercy of nationalistic Ukraine?
As for DNR and LNR, it's as meaningful as saying that Russia is saving people in Ukraine from being burned alive by Ukrainian nationalists [0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Odesa_clashes#Trade_Union...
you really think that russians are scared of police when they walk down the road? i mean im not surprised. this is a very common misconception about how societies in e. europe work
> but at least we aren’t being conscripted and thrown into the meat grinder of a pointless war
given how brave people seem to be online i dare say, "not yet"
That they’re better off than being slaves.
That isn’t what you said. You pushed back on the notion that people fought and continue to fight for others’ rights in America in a way they don’t in modern Russia (or China). That isn’t true, and it isn’t true that America Blacks or women are worse off today than they were two hundred years ago, as OP argued when you pushed back. Perfect is the enemy of good; you’re arguing against American values on a thread about modern Russia.
russia's war in ukraine: 25,000+ civilians killed
number of civilian victims in Vietnam killed by US armed forces: 100,000+
number of civilian victims killed due to US dropping two atomic bombs on Japan: 200,000+
number of civilian deaths due to war in iraq: 200,000+
need i point out more?
as i said, kitsch pigsty. understand the evils committed by your own government before you lecture others. after all you have more freedom than russian people, hence more personal responsibility too. if people do this across the world, world would be a much happier place
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/My...
> number of civilian victims in Vietnam killed by US armed forces: 100,000+
You do know the US involvement in Vietnam lasted 20 years, and Russia is barely past the 1 year mark in Ukraine, right?
during the same period, for a time span of 3 years, the us bombed cambodia and killed over 200,000 civilians as a result
im curious, when do you think was the first one? i mean there was the period of famine while ukraine was part of the ussr, but if thats what you mean lets get few simple facts straight
1) ukraine was an equal republic of the ussr
2) russia was a seperate republic of the ussr. russia had no authority about what goes on in ukraine
3) ussr at that time had a supreme ruler who was of georgian ethnicity
so even if we agree that systematic genocide did happen, it is very hard to argue that russia had anything to do with it
curiously, every time a russian ruled ussr, ukraine was rather well off. for example, under lenin ussr promoted ukranianization [1], under khrushchev ukraine got gifted crimea, while the ussr got a ukranian as its supreme leader [2]
but then again, for sake of fairness, lest we forget that russia, as part of ussr, was a pioneer in workers, women and ethnic rights. so much so that during the 1920s if you were a trade unionist, a feminist or fighting for national liberation of your people you most certainly ran the risk of being labeled a russian agent.