News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by kevinmchugh on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:28PM (#35448087)
Social media is unlike drugs in that if you abstain while your peers use you're in some ways worse off. I wonder if there's a narrower ban to be had, either on image usage or especially on filters
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by brigadier132 on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:41PM (#35448171)
How are you worse off? Also, do we count whatsapp as social media?
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by hyperhopper on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:51PM (#35448249)
Missing invites to parties, social gatherings etc.

Even for not having an iphone I suffer from this, and would miss out on tons more if not for Facebook for event invites, Snapchat/Instagram stories, etc.

Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by baq on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @02:27AM (#35450133)
Green bubble/blue bubble issue?
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by hyperhopper on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @07:58PM (#35462206)
Yes. Apparently it downgrades the group chat experience if a non iOS user is added
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by rysertio on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @10:05PM (#35448355)
> How are you worse off?

Everyone in my middle school used social media to know when to submit assignments, class schedules etc. Without social media you're going to be left out.

Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by master-lincoln on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @07:02AM (#35452125)
Sounds like the kind of info you would get from your teacher. I assume the teachers didn't publish it on social media. So why did you need that info from social media?
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by AbrahamParangi on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:30PM (#35448101)
Drugs also have this property- although I think it’s probably more true in the case of drugs than it is for social media.
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by dragonwriter on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @02:51AM (#35450297)
> Social media is unlike drugs in that if you abstain while your peers use you're in some ways worse off.

I submit that this is not unlike drugs (incl. alcohol), or even golf.

Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by 9dev on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @03:05AM (#35450414)
Not drinking in social settings will make you worse off by a lot. People feel uneasy and judged if someone refuses to drink alcohol with them, so unless you're very strong-willed, this coerces most people into drinking.

This isn't as easy as it sounds at first.

Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by debugnik on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @03:48AM (#35450730)
> People feel uneasy and judged if someone refuses to drink alcohol with them

I always read this on HN but I've never cared, or met any adult that seemed to care, when only a few of us drink beer in a group. Is this a US/Anglosphere thing maybe?

Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by sw104 on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @04:50AM (#35451201)
In the UK, it's definitely a thing.

Being teetotal excludes you from a lot of social events, and even somewhat unrelated events. We have hiking/fitness groups that typically end the training session with a round at the pub. Many workplaces go to the pub together after work.

Not engaging with this can set you back socially and professionally, because drinking is hugely ingrained in the British population. Most people drink multiple times per week. The people I work with genuinely struggle with "Dry January" and other such abstention events.

Going along to these events and not drinking gets you interrogated, and it becomes a thing to try to get you to drink / get drunk. It's probably an inferiority complex thing on the side of the people drinking because seeing somebody not drinking makes them feel bad about it (even though they needn't feel that way).

For every one person like you that doesn't care, there's many who really want to investigate it and get to the bottom of it. Telling these people you just don't like drinking isn't the solution they're looking for out of their investigation.

My 2 pennies as a lifelong teetotal.

Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by Mezzie on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @08:49AM (#35453250)
I was a teetotal until I was 25 and I still drink maybe 2x a year. You're right that some people don't really know what to do with that. I've taken to blaming my meds when really I'm just not a big drinker.
Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by 9dev on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @09:47AM (#35454097)
That's because you've never been in the reverse situation. Think about not drinking at weddings, your birthday, Christmas, family gatherings in general, milestone celebration at work, and lots of other occasions where people typically drink.

I can assure you someone will ask if you're okay, urge you to drink "at least one", or "just a glass of Champaign, it's a special one".

Re:The Case for Banning Children from Social Media by cykros on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @06:57AM (#35452075)
That may be true of illegal drugs, but if you abstain from alcohol you may well be missing out on some social opportunities, and depending on your profession, that could extend to professional opportunities (though admittedly less now than in decades past). Cigarettes for a long time also had this quality, though that's mostly done.