brigadier132
Legacy is the dumbest reason to work and does not explain the motivation of the vast majority of people that are wealthy.
edit: The vast majority of people with more than $10million are completely unknown so the idea that they care about legacy is stupid.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GYOm6ciXcAAZ0vl?format=jpg&name=...
You see, all the fake fields of studies are field with leftists. And sure, you might say democrats aren't leftists, which is what every dumbass marxist says.
Also, putting any value on "studies" when they almost universally fail to replicate outside of hard sciences is dumb.
Can you smelly marxist losers please leave?
The entire idea of economic transactions being exploitative is literal Marxist propaganda. If you read the word "exploit" in some news article and it's referring to economic transactions, you are reading propaganda.
Most people benefit from translation software indirectly. Every localized app / translated tv shows / etc.
When I do the translations, I actually don't even include previous chapters in the context.
The common failure mode is names and genders, for some reason it likes to swap names and genders of characters.
> What brought about the interest?
They are very unique coming from the perspective of an American that has mostly read books published by Western authors. There are all these unique fantasy tropes based on Chinese history that are like a parallel branch to Tolkein based fantasy. Also, you can clearly see that they have completely different value systems and ironically you can tell they are comparatively less censored.
They already have, people don't realize it because expectations have shifted so much because of how transformative it already is.
I'm in a few communities that like to read novels from China / Korea. Claude Sonnet translates Mandarin to English almost perfectly.
I also copy and paste screenshots of Mandarin into it and it transcribes it perfectly too.
A universal language translator of this quality on its own would have been a billion dollar company a year before LLMs were released.
What is your definition of typesafe here? With SeaOrm structs are created directly from the db schema with codegen. This is vastly superior to using strings and checking them at build time.
Just up front, it seems like you think I don't know about how all of these things are implemented.
I do.
So when you say SeaORM has Sqlx as a dependency. I know that. If the purpose of that statement was to say seaorm compile times can't be faster that sqlx because sqlx is a dependency of seaorm, that thought is wrong.
Using SeaORM the way it is intended to be used results in code that is much faster to compile than sqlx being used the way it's intended to be used.
edit: to be clear, it's already happening. Blogs are moving to substack, twitter blocks crawling, reddit is going the same way in blocking all crawlers except google.
They solved the very real problem of DDOS which consequently put them in a position to be a middleman between internet traffic between consumers and producers. Now they are expanding their business to take advantage of this privileged position they have.
> This time, Cloudflare has formed a "marketplace" for the abuse from which they're protecting you, partnering with the abusers.
When the original comment has a statement like this, it's a clear sign there is no potential for constructive discussion. Their understanding of markets has to be completely warped if they think a market existing constitutes partnering with one side of the exchange.
Another non-sequitur. I'm talking about incentives and what I predict will happen based on these incentives.
> I frankly don't think that people have the right to that as a business model and would be more than happy to see AI agents kill off that kind of "free" content.
Frankly, what you think doesn't really matter. It's also very easy to have these moral judgements when you produce absolutely nothing and take everything for free. This is called being a leech.
The above is also a much clearer / more obvious case of copyright infringement than AI training.
> AI agent access cannot be banned without fundamentally breaking the User Agent model of the web.
This is a non-sequitur but yes you are right, everything in the future will be behind a login screen and search engines will die.
Cynicism has become rampant and it's cliche. It's almost always based on some conspiracy theory with no basis in reality and like your original comment shows, relies on abusing emotionally loaded language.
My theory for why cynicism is so common nowadays is that it's a coping mechanism for people who are increasingly incapable of understanding what's happening in the modern world. People are biased towards cynicism because there is nothing worse than being the gullible idiot that is scammed all the time.
It doesn't matter if TCP abstracts or any other layer abstracts this away, if a message can be delivered more than once it does not have the property of exactly once delivery.
You might disagree with this definition but you would be wrong. There is negative value in redefining exactly once delivery to mean what you think it means.