News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by antiterra on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:23AM (#35439188)
“We can't breathe in business class. Somebody's got mace or something.”

“Nobody knows who stabbed who, and we can't even get up to business class right now 'cause nobody can breathe.” - Betty Ong, Flight 11

Not necessarily explosive, but tactical chemical attacks have been a known capability for a while, and part of anti-terrorist training long before 2001. Something truly sophisticated from a superpower state would likely escape detection, (and therefore likely implicate such a state,) but the Tokyo Sarin attack by a cult in 1995 involved big bags of liquid.

Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by carlmr on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:43AM (#35439463)
>"We can't breathe in business class. Somebody's got mace or something.”

100ml of mace would be enough though, right? So why the limit?

Also why is liquid a special category? That doesn't make sense either.

Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by yamtaddle on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @10:43AM (#35440439)
I once lost a 3/4 full normal-size tube of toothpaste because of one of these limits.

Made me wonder how paste-like something has to not count as a liquid to them. Playdough?

How closely do they look at deodorant? Some stick-form ones are more liquid than toothpaste is.

Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by Arrath on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @11:15AM (#35441005)
Thanks to the TSA holding the power, at the very least in the "Well if you have a dispute with my ruling just step to the side and I'll get my manager, hope they wander over before your flight leaves..." way, I have in fact had TSA agents take away my stick deodorant before.
Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by ultrasaurus on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @12:28PM (#35442200)
I had never really thought of that, but the ability to make you miss a flight is an amazingly strong coercive power relative to the stakes.

The x-ray scanners usually have bold signs on them instructing you how to opt out. But if you do, they act as slowly as possible to ensure you never do it again.

Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by marssaxman on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @12:51PM (#35442534)
I opt out every time - I've never used the scanners - and the delay has never been long enough to make me miss a flight.
Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by navhc on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:44AM (#35439474)
There are non-liquid chemical attacks that could be facilitated from something like anthrax to powdered pepper spray. Disallowing liquids does nothing to stop those
Re:Airport scraps 100ml liquid rule with new scanners by twelve40 on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @10:14AM (#35439963)
they can harass you for non-liquids too. I honestly don't even know anymore I've had so many random things confiscated. My favorite was a wine bottle opener which got me into trouble after many years of flying in my bag... in France facepalm