Re:A surprising food may have been a staple of the real Pale...
by senko on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @03:01PM
(#35361688)
Good GPT.
Re:A surprising food may have been a staple of the real Pale...
by FrustratedMonky on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @03:37PM
(#35362196)
Yes. Know it is rude (is it impolite to use GPT?), but I've been playing with GPT and thought I'd give it a shot to see if anyone noticed, or if HN had any detection.
Re:A surprising food may have been a staple of the real Pale...
by ravenstine on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @03:11PM
(#35361818)
Certainly seems like it.
Whether it's GPT or a human, this is wrong:
> Finally, while it is true that the low pH of our stomach acid suggests that our ancestors were not relying on rotten meat as a primary food source, it is important to remember that scavenging for meat was likely an important part of their diet. It is also possible that the ability to run long distances gave our ancestors an advantage in scavenging for meat, as they could cover greater distances in search of carrion.
The point I was making was that our ancestors were relying on scavenged, and probably spoiled meat.
Additionally, while it is true that hominids were making tools by the time they developed to subsist on meat, it is important to remember that the development of technology is a gradual process. It is possible that early hominids were using simple tools like rocks to scavenge for meat before developing more sophisticated weapons like spears and knives.
As for the argument that hominids wouldn't waste energy running if they had access to primitive weaponry, it is important to remember that hunting strategies are often shaped by a variety of factors, including the behavior of the prey species and the environment in which the hunt takes place. In some cases, chasing prey over long distances may have been the most effective strategy available to our ancestors.
Finally, while it is true that the low pH of our stomach acid suggests that our ancestors were not relying on rotten meat as a primary food source, it is important to remember that scavenging for meat was likely an important part of their diet. It is also possible that the ability to run long distances gave our ancestors an advantage in scavenging for meat, as they could cover greater distances in search of carrion.
In conclusion, while the persistence running hypothesis may not be the only explanation for how early hominids acquired meat, it is a compelling hypothesis based on a range of biological and anthropological evidence. It is important to consider multiple hypotheses when trying to understand the behavior of our ancestors, and to remain open to new evidence and alternative interpretations.