prompt="$*"
Since I can use this with multiline input I didn't create a separate data-gpt one.
(Note I also used gpt-3.5-turbo model and not gpt-4 because the former is faster and cheaper and for quick one-offs from cmdline it's usually enough for me).
It's so easy to bait with a #x in a title, and especially when defining in terms of engineer (also an elusive term at times).
"Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."
If anyone suggests a better title (i.e. accurate and neutral, preferably using representative language from the article), we can change it.
is in the first paragraph. I think that's too long for HN though, so maybe:
> how to catapult your productivity via command line functions around OpenAI.
Headline: Here’s a neutral headline for the article: “Improving Programmer Productivity with Command Line Wrapper Functions around OpenAI API” .
Summary: The article at https://kadekillary.work/posts/1000x-eng/ discusses how to improve programmer productivity using command line wrapper functions around the OpenAI API. The author provides examples of functions for generating text and images, and for making code edits. The article is written by Kade Killary and was published on their website on March 29th, 2023
That says almost everything there is to say about the article in 1 comment; and even you've sent most of your time discussing the title and meta-issues.
People aren't missing the point, it just happens that programmer productivity is more interesting (hence the link bait title, I suspect). The article stands on its own without comment.
(yes, I've read them all because I can't believe almost everyone missed the point)
The point of the article is actually neat: a small shell (Fish) script to send query to ChatGPT or DALL-E and get response back in the terminal. As a terminal user myself, this is really nice! (I rewrote it for myself in bash which I use, but used the curl command virtually as is)
The post itself is hilariously over the top (1000x c'mon), quoting 50 Cent and including statements like:
> Unfortunately, due to inflation — real and imagined, 10X just won’t cut it anymore. We need bigger gains, bigger wins, more code, more PRs, more lines, less linting, etc...
Either people really need to be pointed out the sarcasm these days, or everyone's just philosophising about the title (I'm willing to bet it's the latter).