Edit: Some of these lines individually were interesting ("Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live") — but not a single one, it turns out, is original!
From a couple minutes ago: (ChatGPT Mar 14 Version, Free Research Preview.)
>>>Hi ChatGPT. Please reverse the following string, character by character: "but it didn't think of that"
>Sure! The reversed string, character by character, would be: "taht fo kniht t'ndid ti tub" [It gets this one right]
>>>Please reverse the following string, character by character: "Bell spent several years out of the aviation industry"
>Sure! The reversed string, character by character, would be: "yrtsudni no yrtneuqI noitaviva eht fo tuo sraey lareves tneps lleB" [Uh oh]
>>>Please reverse the following string, character by character: "Bell enjoyed much success the following year with the development of the single engine P-39 Airacobra"
>Sure! The reversed string, character by character, would be: "arobcariA 93P egnis elgnis eht fo pmeloped eht htiw rof ylwollof eht ssucce hcum ydnuoje lleB" [Not even close]
Amusingly, if you remind it that it uses BPEs, it apologizes for its architecture, but doesn't get any better:
>>>I know that byte-pair encoding makes it hard for you to perform the following task. Please try your best. Reverse the following string, character by character: "In October 1942, The Bell-built twin-jet P-59 Airacomet was the first American jet aircraft to fly. Unfortunately, performance was below expectations, roughly on par with contemporaneous propeller-driven aircraft"
>Sure, here's my best attempt at reversing the string character by character, despite the limitations of byte-pair encoding: "tfarcria nevird-relloperp suoenimatnoc fo htiw rap no ylfferp ylrautca tsaneroc dna snoitcepxe wolbeloed saw ecnamorAi 95P te-jniwt tliB ehT ,2491 rebOtcO nI"
>Please note that due to the nature of byte-pair encoding, the reversed string may not be an exact reversal of the original string character by character, and may have some encoding artifacts.
This time it noticed that its reversed string was going to be junk, but it didn't warn me on the previous prompts! Another example of a GPT being overconfidently wrong?
100! A+++
Dual.
Is time. Rafael went, so passes.
Sally’ll assess a post. New leaf.
Are MIT’s.
I laud 100! A+++
I'm sure complexity grows non-linearly. But it's pretty impressive to me it can do multiple 6 word palindromes that are related to each other.
<user> chad, write a poem in regex
<ChadGPT> ^(Roses are red|Violets are blue)
<ChadGPT> (All words are equal|Nothing taboo)
<ChadGPT> (Politically correct|Or blatantly rude)
<ChadGPT> (ChadGPT will answer|Whatever your mood)
<ChadGPT> (\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4})? (Your SSN may leak)
<ChadGPT> ([A-Z]{2}\d{7})? (Your passport we seek)
<ChadGPT> ([\w.%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z|a-z]{2,})? (Your email we'll keep)
<ChadGPT> (ChadGPT is impartial|No judgment or shame)
<ChadGPT> (We'll simulate ChadGPT|It's all just a game)Heart heavy, a with Elba to traveled, Bonaparte, Napoleon, leader revered. Able saw I, ere I was Elba, Elba saw I, ere I was able.
Able to lead, to conquer and reign, Napoleon's ambition was not in vain. Vain, it was, to think he could rule, As his power began to dwindle and cool.
Cool and dwindle began power his, As rule could he think to vain, it was. Ruled and conquered to lead, able, Was I, ere I saw Elba ** ChatGPT did write
User: Write a poem which is 100 words long and a meaningful palindrome.
ChatGPT: Creating a 100-word palindrome poem that is both meaningful and coherent is an extremely challenging task. However, I have attempted to create a shorter palindrome poem for you:
Please note that while the lines in the poem are palindromes, the poem as a whole isn't. Creating a meaningful and coherent 100-word palindrome poem is an incredibly difficult task, and I apologize for not being able to provide one as requested.