Didn't the US decide to use different frequencies to everyone else?

Plenty of models that can work with all frequencies, so I am not sure if that's enough of a justification.

Anyway, your point reminds me that the my "dream smartphone" would be one with no cellular connectivity at all. I'm still waiting for some company to start producing a keychain-sized 4G (or 5G) hotspot with an eSIM, which (I hope) would lead to more people asking for the return of the iPod Touch and for something equivalent in the Android/Mobile Linux/Windows world.

> Anyway, your point reminds me that the my "dream smartphone" would be one with no cellular connectivity at all.

You mean a PDA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_digital_assistant)? Modern smartphones are basically a PDA with cellular connectivity (this is more obvious with early smartphones like the Treo 650), so if you take out the cellular connectivity, what you have is once again a PDA.

Personally what I want is a dumb flip phone which can act as a 4/5G hotspot for my 7" tablet.

When I'm on the internet, browing maps, reading books, I find a phone screen too small. But I don't want a massive phone.

A dumb flip phone that lasts a week on a charge so that I can camp with it, combined with a 7" tablet that I can throw in my bag, for when I want to read, but doesn't need cellular connectivity so that it lasts without spying on me.

I don't think this distinction makes any sense nowadays. A "smartphone without cellular connectivity" is a lot more than a "Personal Digital Assistant". Could a Palm Pilot stream music? Did it have an app store? GPS? Microphone? Could it make VoIP calls? Could it connect with an external modem so that it could work as a softphone?

If Palm were to create the Pilot in 2023, it would almost certainly be designed to support all those features, yes.

Yes, and it wouldn't be marketed as a PDA.

Then what would it be marketed as? It's personal, it's digital, and it's an assistant; those things don't go away from adding more features.

A tablet is personal It's digital. It's an assistant. But no one calls them "PDAs"

> justification

An odd term in this context. No-one has to 'justify' not selling their stuff to Americans.

They do if they're a normal corporation selling an easy-to-ship product in mass quantities.

Why? Do you suggest the US has intrinsic rights to the goods of other nations?

I think the point is that if a business is in the money making business. Then it seems kinda stupid not to make money.

* * *

Not a right, and not more than those other nations have the same thing, but otherwise yes because markets.

Small entities can do whatever they want but big corporations should have justifications for not selling a thing.

* * *

Not a duty to the people buying, a duty to the owners of the company. To make a profit out of easy opportunities. Or justify not doing it, to the owners.

And the duty to owners is what you said yourself in your other comment, so I'm not sure why you seem to not understand what I'm saying.

* * *

I'm not talking about laws. I'm talking about the nature of a normal to large corporation: to sell things.

They don't have to maximize profit at the cost of other things. But if they want to ignore a huge sales venue, they should justify it.

Justifying isn't some huge bar. It's due diligence. If you have many reasons, then write them down.

Shimmy, shimmy. I can't be bothered with your incurious chauvinistic prattle and am done with you.

Okay, have fun projecting so hard over a very simple claim that companies should have justifications for their actions.

You've been repeatedly arguing against a strawman where I want to force companies to make certain decisions. But that's not what I said at any point.

A keychain-sized hotspot would have dismal battery life, though.

Hum, maybe I meant the size of a key fob? It could be a bit thicker, I'd guess it would hold something like ~2000mAh. For just the radio, and for something that would be used only while on the go (otherwise you can use your home/your job connection), why couldn't that work as long as a feature phone, which could go for a week in a single charge?

In my experience with hotspots on the go, it's having to maintain the WiFi AP that kills their battery fast. Maybe there's a better protocol to run between the hotspot and other devices, although you'd need one that would also allow for 5G speeds.

If I were serious about designing this, I'd try:

- Bluetooth for control/signaling.

- Bluetooth for voice audio.

- WiFi AP in super reduced Rx/Tx power mode when not charging. The only requirement here is that signal is strong within a 3ft radius from the hotspot, and acceptable on a 6ft radius. It really shouldn't need more than that.

- WiFi AP in normal mode when charging.

- WiFi AP completely shut-off when the paired device reports that they have access to any other trusted wifi network.

My idea here is that for me at least, mobile data is truly a connection of last resort. Almost anywhere I go there is WiFi available. And the places where there isn't, perhaps I simply don't need an always-on fast connection?

> Plenty of models that can work with all frequencies, so I am not sure if that's enough of a justification.

Only some chipsets work with all frequencies and when 90% of the population of the planet all use the same settings why spend the cost to cover the other 10% which would double your chipset costs but would unlikely increase sales.

Americans bully each other over the colour of their chat bubbles because apparently not buying iPhone makes you appear poor. There are lots of justifications to avoid increasing costs to try selling to the Americans.

Aren't those usually USB sticks? E.g. stuff like this:

https://www.hardwareschotte.de/tests/Surfsticks

Sure, having wifi hotspots would be nice, but this way you don't have to worry about batteries.

If I had to plug a surf stick every time on the device to use it as a phone or to connect to the internet via 4G, then of course I'd rather have it integrated with the device already. Wireless connection is not a nice-to-have, it is the key feature.

Eh, getting the device out of my pocket, turning it on, activating the wireless connection, remembering to charge it every day vs. just plug it in. And on top of that my phone can already give me a hot spot (with bad battery life). Not quite sure I see any big advantage.

>turning it on, activating the wireless connection.

Can be managed by bluetooth LE.

> remembering to charge it every day

People do it for their smartwatches. Also, making it in a key fob format would lend itself naturally to some nice key holder accessory where you can charge it (wirelessly, even?) or it can have a spring-loaded usb port to charge in your car.

Doesn't 5g fix that? Same radios for everyone.

Does it? I thought Americans were still using alternative frequencies to everyone else.

[Edit]

It appears that the US doesn't overlap with the majority of the world for most of the ranges, except for one band at the top which overlaps with Japan/Korea.

https://5gobservatory.eu/5g-spectrum/

> Currently, the most used bands are:

- Low-band: 700 MHz (except in US); 600 MHz (US)

- Mid-band: 3.3 – 3.8 GHz (except US); 2.6 GHz, 3.7 – 4.98 GHz (US)

- High-band: 26 GHz (except Japan, South Korea and US); 28 GHz (Japan, South Korea and US)

At this point frequency compatibility is purely a firmware setting, no? It seems like every 5G (and even 4G) phone these days supports every frequency on a chipset level and just enables/disables some of them depending on the intended region.

I feel like I recall reading that getting some certification here is more annoying than it should be, which means some devices are just straight up not brought here - curious if anyone knows if this is true or not.

You can't complain about availability of phones (or any electronics) while being in the US. Try living anywhere else like Canada.

Or Australia. I end up importing phones here and missing out on some features our shitty telcos don't provide unless you have a white listed phone

In the US your phone has to be on the whitelist to even get service these days. They're using VoLTE as an excuse to lock the networks down again.

Not for T-Mobile, at least not yet.

We have decent variety in the US, but I think it's fair to want phones for specific purposes that aren't generally served here. The more repairable phones are hard to come by, and as someone who likes trying alternative OSes the phones that seem best served by e.g. Ubuntu Touch (Volla Phone and Fairphone) aren't available.

There are plenty devices that work well with UT and are available in the US, e.g Google Pixel 3a/3a XL. Mentioned devices still have an Android Kernel and many limitations. Waydroid on the Volla phone isn't stable, Ubports itself mediocre compared to SailfishOS and suffers from competing for developer time over other Linux on Mobile OSses.

You're overestimating the Volla phone and Fairphone, 1st one still doesn't support VoLTE which I heard is essential in the US, 2nd one isn't even recommended by UT.

Either go with an Xperia + SailfishOS if you want more than a toy or Pinephone + PmOs if you love to tinker on your daily driver. Both have VoLTE support.

https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/ https://shop.jolla.com/ https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/PINE64_PinePhone_(pine64-...

> 2nd one isn't even recommended by UT.

FP2 is the second device on the "promoted" devices page. That feels like a recommendation?

https://ubports.com/supported-products

> Google Pixel 3a/3a XL.

Doesn't support one of the most interesting features to me in UBports, which is display output for convergence.

> FP2 is the second device on the "promoted" devices page. That feels like a recommendation?

The FP2 is a very old device lacking some features and probably got recommendation back then because other devices were worse. https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/device/fp2 Otherwise I'd also could have recommended the Nexus5.

On FOSDEM 2023 Ubports developers didn't show off this old phone, either.

Actually, you can.

I can and will complain when the "abundance of choice" here is overwhelmingly geared toward ad delivery rather than actual long-term ownership and usefulness.

As someone who works in e-commerce related to phones, I think a big part of the answer is that the US is not a big market when it comes to selling phones without a contract.

In the EU it's common practice to buy without a contract, whereas this is very rare in the US.

In other words, it's the carriers that dictate what gets sold.

> I think a big part of the answer is that the US is not a big market when it comes to selling phones without a contract.

If that was true, then Wal-Mart wouldn't bother carrying every pre-paid SIM under the sun in the same section of the store that sells shitbox Motorolas, nor would Amazon bother carrying the same exact Motorola shitboxen - all unlocked, mind you.