News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Pentagon Declines to Answer If It Shot Down $12 Balloon with $400k Missile. Parent comment

Re:Pentagon Declines to Answer If It Shot Down $12 Balloon w... by sabujp on Sunday February 19, 2023 @07:38PM (#34863534)
you're wrong about the private waste, I'm angry about it also but I can't do anything about that. But as a tax payer in the top 2% in the US I am justified in my anger towards the US govt wasting tax payer dollars shooting AIM-9x in F-22s to blow up balloons.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pentagon Declines to Answer If It Shot Down $12 Balloon w... by shitlord on Sunday February 19, 2023 @08:56PM (#34864104)
Was there a more cost effective way to shoot down the balloon? Is there any actual competition in the missile industry?

I read the story about the F-18 shooting down a balloon with its gun, but it's also expensive to fly and maintain such a jet.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pentagon Declines to Answer If It Shot Down $12 Balloon w... by jtsiskin on Sunday February 19, 2023 @08:59PM (#34864125)
…not shooting it down in the first place.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pentagon Declines to Answer If It Shot Down $12 Balloon w... by shitlord on Sunday February 19, 2023 @09:11PM (#34864184)
If a balloon really is operated by someone attempting to spy on sensitive military installations, it makes financial sense to shoot it down. It's cheaper to spend 400k on a missile than to have your adversary learn something they shouldn't.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pentagon Declines to Answer If It Shot Down $12 Balloon w... by panarky on Monday February 20, 2023 @06:15PM (#34874198)
If the federal budget is $2T and if you paid $100K of that in taxes, your contribution to a $400k wasted missile is two cents. I might suggest that two cents does not justify very much anger.
[ Parent | on HN ]