No, we do not need need social media arm chair quarterbacks dealing with national defense based issues....
> Establish a single and authoritative line of communication.
None of this affect most citizens they have no need to be informed unless necessary.
> Failing to get ahead of the narrative gives the appearance of uncertainty and confusion.
Politics in war time is always messy. Lets let them focus on the task at hand.
Or: without "messy" politics (political censorship and manipulation of the people) you can't have wars.
It's always necessary to keep citizens informed. The government and by extension the military exists to serve citizens.
Is this aliens? I don't have time to deep dive this myself.
If you're wrong about this and I survive an alien invasion you'll be slated in my tell-all nonethewiser.
Leave chocolates, it may be Cupid ... though no guarantee that it'll make your heart safe, just hopefully it'll be a sweet encounter.
One of the main benefits of this site is that one doesn't have to waste time pushing through reams of clever references.
Edit: another user posted a twitter link to someone claiming they saw the object. This does not look like a balloon and I completely can understand why there is a slower response here (I have no reason to distrust this twitter user) https://twitter.com/0rangeandwhite/status/162460072656239001...
Why would you automatically trust a random twitter user? Or was that a joke that flew over my head?
A social media misinformation storm?
https://twitter.com/0rangeandwhite/status/162460072656239001...
Interestingly, none of the reports state that the US or allies engaged or shot down the object.
A balloon invasion, looks like it.
On a slightly more serious note, I had read yesterday somewhere on Twitter that that thing over Alaska might in fact have been a US meteorological balloon, which would explain the Americans not accusing the Chinese again after they had shot it.
>IMHO a death would cause much more media outrage.
Perfect! Chinese-killer-balloon kills US-Citizen on it's on US-Ground, FOX would love that!
That's what i mean. Why not shoot it down when it enters US-Waters...BEFORE it's over US-Land, is that so hard to understand?
In Alaska...please shut up.
>they wanted to shoot it down in a location in which it would be easily recoverable
Like yesterday the car sized ufo in alaska?
You are comparing two completely different games and you know it.
https://mobile.twitter.com/GovGianforte/status/1624596970491...
>I received a briefing tonight at the White House about an object in Montana airspace. I will continue to receive regular updates.
>With questions about the Chinese spy balloon still unanswered, the Biden administration must be fully forthcoming with Montanans and all Americans.
One of Montana's house reps said:
>I am in direct contact with NORCOM and monitoring the latest issue over Havre and the northern border. Airspace is closed due to an object that could interfere with commercial air traffic — the DOD will resume efforts to observe and ground the object in the morning.
https://twitter.com/RepRosendale/status/1624579901608034306
Something is definitely happening. We shot down an object over Alaska yesterday, and then again today we shot down yet another object over Canada.
That's three objects shot down in about a week, whereas the last time we shot anything down over US airspace was arguably during WW2.