News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by ttul on Saturday February 04, 2023 @10:08PM (#34661359)
One of the most technically challenging things about reconnaissance satellites is dealing with the high speed at which the satellite moves over the target. A balloon flies much lower and vastly more slowly. It can loiter over an area, sucking in electronic signals and taking photographs with extremely high fidelity.

I don’t think the Chinese meant for this balloon to cross the United States. I believe they were testing it for use over other countries or perhaps for use during wartime. Their apology was way too quick for this to have been anything other than a genuine accident.

Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by remarkEon on Saturday February 04, 2023 @10:22PM (#34661463)
Did they actually apologize? I thought all they said is that it was a weather balloon. Regardless, I'm very interested in what hardware was actually on this thing. Hopefully the public gets a summary of what USN pulls up during recovery.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by ttul on Saturday February 04, 2023 @11:15PM (#34661779)
“… the uncharacteristic speed and contrition of China’s statement as indications that it was probably a genuine error…”

https://www.economist.com/china/2023/02/03/how-a-balloon-bur...

Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by khuey on Saturday February 04, 2023 @11:39PM (#34661933)
They put out a statement a few hours ago whining that it was shot down so I wouldn't take that "apology" for much.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by Choco31415 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @01:13AM (#34662445)
Can you share a link to the statement?
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by T-A on Sunday February 05, 2023 @01:38AM (#34662556)
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by barbariangrunge on Sunday February 05, 2023 @12:48AM (#34662318)
The "how we use data" popup, on the article about surveillance, was awkward
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by moneywoes on Saturday February 04, 2023 @10:49PM (#34661637)
The route is almost impossible to be a coincidence though
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday February 05, 2023 @12:23AM (#34662197)
It has to be along a jet stream, so you would be correct. It isn’t coincidentally along that jet stream, since it’s a balloon, and maneuverability is extreme limited to going up and down to catch different streams.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by nomay on Saturday February 04, 2023 @11:23PM (#34661838)
Wouldn't that be much more convenient to just use those passenger planes?
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by KennyBlanken on Sunday February 05, 2023 @02:37AM (#34662794)
...but a satellite is a stable platform, and a balloon is anything but.

After your "weighing paint" comment I think you should probably stop talking.

Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ... by geysersam on Sunday February 05, 2023 @03:28AM (#34663021)
But according to some comment in this thread, it has happened several times before.

If true, that's unlikely to be a mistake.