News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by Something1234 on Monday January 30, 2023 @08:42PM (#34589721)
Why a subdomain and not just a random page?

Are class actions always at the federal level and not the state level?

Also lawyers wouldn't like that very much, camp lejune is being a pile of pain.

Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by ceejayoz on Monday January 30, 2023 @08:51PM (#34589811)
Subdomain to avoid polluting the .gov namespace too much. States could do similar; settlements.ny.gov.

I’m tired of the “phishing or real?” game with these things.

Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by ratorx on Monday January 30, 2023 @10:22PM (#34590460)
Your original comment suggests you are proposing:

[class action identifier].settlements.gov

Parent is asking why not:

settlements.gov/[class action identifier]

Using a different page rather than subdomain wouldn’t have any real phishing downsides and would avoid polluting DNS entirely, so seems better.

Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by ec109685 on Monday January 30, 2023 @11:58PM (#34591364)
Wildcard can avoid the dns polluting. The domain prefix stands out a bit more and let’s them have their own cookies.
Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by aliqot on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @12:03AM (#34591396)
I didn't consider the lets them have their own cookies part, but I kinda like it, however I don't really know why other than I like separations of concerns. Why do you prefer that, and what scenarios have necessitated that in the past if you don't mind me asking?
Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by zinekeller on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @01:04AM (#34591786)
Actual reason: because there are different firms administering these settlements. You want to separate these by subdomain so that there isn't a chance that an administrator from one site hijacking into another. Unless you're proposing the government to directly call/mail affected persons (might be desirable in cases like the JnJ Talc powder case where it is clearly a retail case).
Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by aliqot on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @01:44AM (#34592021)
Ah that's a great reason, thanks. It helps when you framed it up in current events, really made sense.
Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation by ceejayoz on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @07:05AM (#34594051)
I don’t want the gov building and hosting the sites; I just want CNAMEs pointing at the law firms’ sites.