Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation
by ec109685 on Monday January 30, 2023 @11:58PM
(#34591364)
Wildcard can avoid the dns polluting. The domain prefix stands out a bit more and let’s them have their own cookies.
Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation
by aliqot on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @12:03AM
(#34591396)
I didn't consider the lets them have their own cookies part, but I kinda like it, however I don't really know why other than I like separations of concerns. Why do you prefer that, and what scenarios have necessitated that in the past if you don't mind me asking?
Re:Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation
by zinekeller on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @01:04AM
(#34591786)
Actual reason: because there are different firms administering these settlements. You want to separate these by subdomain so that there isn't a chance that an administrator from one site hijacking into another. Unless you're proposing the government to directly call/mail affected persons (might be desirable in cases like the JnJ Talc powder case where it is clearly a retail case).
[class action identifier].settlements.gov
Parent is asking why not:
settlements.gov/[class action identifier]
Using a different page rather than subdomain wouldn’t have any real phishing downsides and would avoid polluting DNS entirely, so seems better.