News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by photoGrant on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @12:55PM (#34328718)
> For example, more than 35% of all Autopilot crashes occur when the Tesla vehicle is rear-ended by another vehicle.

Well, if you want to know why some people are rear ending a Tesla, it's because it's far more unpredictable than a human driver.

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/10/tesla-crash-footage-auto...

Also it seems to contradict itself on data collection. First;

> In practice, this correlates to nearly any crash at about 12 mph (20 kph) or above, depending on the crash forces generated

But then they've decided to ignore crashes that doesn't deploy an airbag or similar...

> recent analysis led us to identify and implement upgrades to our data reporting. Specifically, we discovered reports of certain events where no airbag or other active restraint deployed [...]

So now we're only counting major accidents?

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by enslavedrobot on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:09PM (#34330774)
Given that per the NHTSA 29% of all accidents are rear end collisions, I don't think the 35% number is meaningful, given the small sample size.

Also: Tesla has always been clear about their definition of "crash", it hasn't changed since they started reporting years ago.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by photoGrant on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:45PM (#34331214)
> Also: Tesla has always been clear about their definition of "crash", it hasn't changed since they started reporting years ago.

But it says specifically it does since Jan 2023 and they've retroactively adjusted their previous reporting...

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bdcravens on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:25PM (#34330959)
Does the Tesla always activate its brake lights when slowing down? (I have an EV6, and I don't even know if brakes lights come on when I'm using regen as opposed to the brake pedal) When I'm driving and traffic is stopped ahead, I used to always brake not because I had to, but as an indication to the car behind me.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by chollida1 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:32PM (#34331059)
https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/is_is/GUID-3DFFB07....

Yes, but it depends on the speed you are going

> If regenerative braking is aggressively slowing Model Y (such as when your foot is completely off the accelerator pedal at highway speeds), the brake lights turn on to alert others that you are slowing down.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by throwthroyaboat on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:33PM (#34331064)
Yes, brake lights are illuminated under any deceleration above a certain threshold, or application of the brake pedal.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by gnicholas on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:32PM (#34331052)
According to this article [1], the brake lights do come on. But the article is from 2021, so who knows if that is still true (or if it was ever true for all Teslas).

1: https://www.greencarfuture.com/electric/does-regen-braking-t...

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by brianwawok on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:59PM (#34331392)
It is. You can see it on your little icon that the brakes turn on. Anything reasonably fast shows brakes.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by jacquesm on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:34PM (#34331078)
Yes, as soon as you hit regen your brake lights come on. I tested this with a Honda Hybrid a long time ago to make sure. If your car has a diagram somewhere that you can display while driving you will actually see it on the display.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by gnicholas on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:45PM (#34331224)
This isn't a universal truth. It varies by vehicle, and apparently even by what level of regen is selected.

https://www.greencarfuture.com/electric/does-regen-braking-t...

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by jacquesm on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:24PM (#34331720)
"Conclusion: Do Brake Lights Activate During Regenerative Braking? Yes, but Stay Alert"

Seems pretty obvious, the idea is that engine braking would also cause your car to slow down without lighting up the brake lights so any kind of slowdown at that level would not normally engage the brake lights. But as soon as you slow down more than that the lights will come on, making its behavior pretty close to what you'd expect from a regular car with and ICE lacking regenerative braking.

Or would you suggest that a normal car should engage it's brake lights when you let go of the accelerator and engine brake? (I can see a case for that.)

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by fortylove on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:28PM (#34331003)
Thanks for asking this. I've never thought of the implications of re-gen braking when slowing down!
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by yellow_postit on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:37PM (#34331123)
Searching around seems inconsistent across different brands/models/model years (eg Bolt behavior changed recently). As one pedal driving becomes more prevalent might be something in need of a standard.

For Tesla Model Y:

> If regenerative braking is aggressively slowing Model Y (such as when your foot is completely off the accelerator pedal at highway speeds), the brake lights turn on to alert others that you are slowing down.

Source: Model Y manual: https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/is_is/GUID-3DFFB07...

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by tyingq on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:47PM (#34331241)
Might be a nice addition for other cars, for example, when you aggressively downshift and decelerate that way.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by cptskippy on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:13PM (#34331584)
Yes, even the little CGI model of your car in the UI even shows your brake lights illuminate. AFAIK the the CGI representation of the car accurately shows tire position, blinkers, headlights, doors, etc.

In comparison, my 2015 Leaf doesn't illuminate the brake lights during regen but it's regen is significantly less than my Model 3.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bagels on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:39PM (#34331148)
Autopilot does emergency braking for nonexistent obstacles. I'm sure it's contributing to rear end collision risk. I stopped using it for this reason.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by CamperBob2 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:51PM (#34331288)
Every autonomous braking system has that problem, including the one in my 2020 Macan. They are dangerously-flaky hacks. As of 2025 they are mandated by law.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by mrguyorama on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:01PM (#34331436)
I own another VAG car with automatic emergency braking. If it is actually applying the brakes for you more than in cases where you are clearly about to rear-end someone, you should consider not tailgating as much. The sensor even gives you a warning if you are following too close at highway speeds.

The radar system they use in modern VW and Audi cars is extremely conservative, claiming to not engage the brakes at all above 35 mph, and waiting until the last possible moment to apply the brakes below that window. It's been absurdly accurate for me. Once every few months or so it "warns" outside of a dangerous situation, but they are almost always situations I could have prevented with a gentler approach to driving, for example following closely a truck with a trailer that is slowly turning off the street will erroneously activate the warning because I'm continuing as if it will be out of my way, which is not the safest.

The time it activated in a real danger situation it didn't even apply the brakes, it "primed" them so that my action of pressing the brakes would happen faster.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by FireBeyond on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:13PM (#34331591)
> The radar system they use in modern VW and Audi cars is extremely conservative, claiming to not engage the brakes at all above 35 mph, and waiting until the last possible moment to apply the brakes below that window.

I love my 2021 RS 5, but I have to disagree with this. Even in Traffic Jam adaptive mode, many times it will accelerate towards a vehicle _that it detects_, and only brake very late, and hard. On several occasions I've intervened because I wasn't sure if it would. When I've been alone in the car, I've waited later (and seen it brake hard, of its own accord), when I've held off on the brake since I have no passengers to give whiplash.

It will also absolutely emergency brake above 35mph.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by mrguyorama on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:29PM (#34331789)
It's possible the features introduced in the upmarket trims are to blame. I have all the hardware for things like distance based cruise control and parking assistance and lane keeping, but the previous owner did not buy them so I ONLY have automatic emergency braking. In 20k miles the worst problem I had was it failing self-calibration and just turning itself off for a few months.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by FireBeyond on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:33PM (#34331837)
Definitely possible - my girlfriend has a 2017 A4 without anything but AEB, basically, so I have no real comparison source.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by CamperBob2 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:05PM (#34331470)
If it is actually applying the brakes for you more than in cases where you are clearly about to rear-end someone, you should consider not tailgating as much

Thanks, Dad. Clearly I have no idea what I'm doing, or what I'm talking about, so my real-world experience is invalid.

For the benefit of everyone else, phantom braking is a thing that by definition occurs when you're not following anyone. Such as when the car slams on the brakes upon approaching a car that's clearly about to turn right from a nearby parking lot, but who is equally clearly waiting for you to pass before entering the road.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by mrguyorama on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:41PM (#34331926)
I think I meant to add more weasel words to that like "consider". Let me be more direct. In 20k miles in this vehicle, I have never once encountered the radar based AEB warning, not even activating, in a situation where it wasn't obviously sensing a car that would be in the path of my vehicle. It has not activated for trash, or overhead bridges, or cars in the next lane over, or any of the number of things everyone else says radar can't handle. It has only ever warned me when there is a car in front of me, sometimes a car that is taking extra time to turn off the road, once because of a car in a suicide lane. In those instances it does NOTHING else than play a generic warning tone and put a red warning on the dash, it never activates the brakes, and does not even do the brake "priming" that it claims to do if it thinks an accident is likely. It is EXTREMELY conservative, to the point that I do not consider it a backup.

I shouldn't have been patronizing, I'm just so confused how the same hardware and (possibly) software can produce such different results. Why would the audi version be so much more sensitive?

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by shiftpgdn on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @02:25PM (#34343233)
I did 30,000 miles in a 2019 outback with a significant amount of phantom breaking, more than I've had in my Tesla or e-tron. Anecdotes don't mean much.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bagels on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:29PM (#34331788)
The rate for me was approximately 1 emergency brake maneuver per 6 miles of driving. I doubt any of them are as bad as the Tesla system.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by cyrux004 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:53PM (#34331307)
Apparently not as common as Tesla. You should read about "phantom braking" issues on Tesla , especially after they removed the radar
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by CamperBob2 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:56PM (#34331339)
Yeah, I can't even imagine what it would be like to implement a system like that without radar. Tesla's approach would make a good Most Interesting Man In the World meme. "I don't always tackle the hardest engineering problems in human history, such as self-driving cars. But when I do, I tie one hand behind my back, close one eye, and consume some alcohol or drugs first."

One episode per 3000 miles is too many, and that's about what I was seeing before I disabled the feature.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bryanlarsen on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:01PM (#34331429)
Are you referring to the "gentle slow down" behavior that Autopilot often does or the "slam on the brakes as hard as you can" behavior of Automatic Emergency Braking? I definitely see the former more than once per 3000 miles but it doesn't bother me. I've never seen the latter.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by CamperBob2 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:09PM (#34331528)
In my vehicle, the 'gentle slow down' part that's associated with the radar-driven auto cruise control usually works OK. I'm referring to false triggering of AEB in completely-inappropriate circumstances when no obstacle is in the car's path.

If someone has built an AEB system with the degree of immunity from false triggers that's needed to make it a net positive for road safety, I haven't seen any evidence yet. Similar complaints across many different car models are widespread.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bagels on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @10:14PM (#34334617)
On my car, all of these occurred frequently.

It definitely is erratic with the speed, speeding up and slowing down slightly, which is annoying, but not so dangerous.

The dangerous parts are driving home from work, 6 miles, at least two very hard brakes each trip with no cars ahead of me (I only made a few trips like this before disabling it).

Automatic emergency braking (with the loud beeps and red message on the screen) on two lane highways, over crests, a myriad of other circumstances.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by culi on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:31PM (#34333909)
Musk's obsession with not relying on radar and using only cameras as sensors is nuts and likely a big reason why competitors systems perform so much better. But it seems Tesla has finally backtracked on this

https://electrek.co/2022/06/08/tesla-files-use-new-radar-con...

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bryanlarsen on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:57PM (#34331350)
Better a false positive (phantom braking) than a false negative (not braking when it should). I imagine they're all tuned with this in mine.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by dbt00 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:35PM (#34331850)
Are you kidding me? One of the several times autopilot tried to kill me was when it randomly tried to flat stop on I-80 with a semi driver following me. No way he could have stopped in time if I hadn't disengaged and slammed on the accelerator.

(Absolutely no reason to stop and no weather or afternoon sun for confusion. My best guess is that flaky vision systems thought a semi truck was entering my lane, but I really don't know.)

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bryanlarsen on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @07:25PM (#34333431)
But it didn't kill you. If you had a false negative, that means it failed to stop when it should have, and that almost definitely would have caused an accident. False negatives are more dangerous than false positives. Both can be dangerous, but false negatives are worse.

All AEB's from all manufacturers have a certain amount of phantom braking, but non-Tesla AEB are well studied and definitely save lives.

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by culi on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:33PM (#34333925)
GP gave an obvious example of a false positive. I don't why them thinking fast enough to save their life neglects the point...
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by bagels on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:30PM (#34331803)
I think the current state of Tesla's self driving is more dangerous in this respect than I am.
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by CamperBob2 on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @01:08PM (#34342016)
"Here's a drug that is guaranteed to prevent pancreatic cancer if you take it every day, but is very likely to give you one or more heart attacks at random intervals. Even if that happens, though, you'll probably be OK, because most of the heart attacks won't be all that severe. Want some?"

"Oh, by the way, starting in 2025, your breakfast cereal will be legally required to contain this drug."

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by culi on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:27PM (#34333879)
Someone else on HN commented this the other day. RSymons RSEV did a comparison[0] of the self-park feature of Tesla's compared to three other cars. All cars nailed the spots they tested flawlessly while the Tesla just straight up didn't see most of the spots. When they moved the cars further and further away so that the spot became more obvious it eventually did see the spot but parked over a foot from the curb

Tesla seems to have a lot of software issues when it comes to "smart" features like these. I wouldn't be surprised if they are indeed worse than the competition, but I'd love to see a similar comparison

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsb2XBAIWyA

Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by killjoywashere on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:45PM (#34331217)
Keep in mind, you can reasonably assume many minor accidents don't get reported to the government database. But Tesla is afflicted by perfect (or near perfect) knowledge of every vehicle in the fleet. A line has to be drawn somewhere. 0.1 mph? 2 mph? 25 mph? Half that? Where would you draw the line to be comparable to the federal data?
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by FireBeyond on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:03PM (#34331458)
Sure. But we're very much in the data gathering phase of autonomous/semi-autonomous/enhanced driver assist vehicles, so I have a hard time arguing that "we don't really need to report this incident (not accident) to a database".
Re:Tesla Vehicle Safety Report by throwawayacc3 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:25PM (#34331733)
>Well, if you want to know why some people are rear ending a Tesla, it's because it's far more unpredictable than a human driver.

How unpredictable is a solid 5 seconds of the Tesla signaling it's lane change then slowing down? I blame the asshole that was in the far left lane going way too fast and not slowing down (just letting off the accelerator when the Tesla signalled would have prevented the accident) when someone is trying to enter. Then they brake way too late. Everyone behind that first vehicle is also to blame for following too closely at too fast of a speed.