You see this a lot with Supreme Court cases where the legal teams form their arguments specially to be persuasive to a specific swing judge.
A: You have a group of people who, broadly speaking, are motivated to address systemic racial and economic inequality.
B: You will have better luck getting someone on-board with your piece of legislation if you frame it in the context of an issue they care about.
A + B: Hello senator, this bill I'm proposing about gas ranges will help address systemic racial and economic inequality because...
The idea that you think A is talking about a group of racists is quite literally insane.
"Yawn, what color are they?"
"White."
"Oh that's a serious issue then!"
I also looked into induction, but only my cast iron skillet would work -- the stainless steel cookware I have apparently is the non-magnetic type (a magnet doesn't stick to them) so they won't work with induction.
It's very fast and so much easier to clean. I wouldn't want to go back to gas really.
Not all "old stuff" has an induction compatible replacement. Induction does not work for everyone, even if you're willing to replace all of your pans.
I'll keep my gas range with real vent hood, thank you.
https://www.all-clad.com/d3-stainless-7-piece-cookware-set.h...
But I think the bigger issue is whether current users even want to make the switch, since gas is often cheaper than electricity.
This slowed down adoption of induction cookers a lot in the UK for example.