> In my opinion, housing is the final frontier for this. If housing is bought up by corporates and rented back, we are both feet into corporate dystopia. Land should be between citizens and the states that write the titles.

All land should be owned by the public. To use it you would rent it for the market value, that money would be distributed to the citizens as a basic income. As the land becomes more valuable (society shifts to urbanization and cities become more valued), the cost of that land increases, but so does the basic income.

That's what happens now, except the people benefiting from the cost of the land isn't the public, but the land owner.

On the other hand, if a new power plant is opened up, land value reduces, and the land occupier pays less. Currently they just lose out, hence the NIMBY problem.