Even if it did increase risk of heart disease, which I think it most likely does not, I'd rather live a life feeling amazing and die at 75 than feeling subpar all the time living until 95.
They also move around much more, don't eat tons of refined carbs and sugars, live in more "sociable" societies, etc.
It should be obvious by now that subtle genetic differences can hold a huge influence in regards to what a "healthy" diet for someone is. IMO, there isn't enough research being done on such matters.
https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/high-fat-diet-made-inuits-heal...
There are other reasons, but Inuits also don't live long compare to others. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-inuit/inuit-lifespan-stag...
Best take I've seen on this debate. TLDR, in general its better to recommend a plant majority diet on a population basis but on an individual level, try an elimination diet to see what works and what dosent
So much conflicting studies on this, I'm at a loss to what to believe, including this study that points otherwise: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/saturated-f...