Re:What ever happened to the first cryogenically frozen humans?
by scotty79 on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @05:27AM
(#34064000)
Why not die at 30 then in the spirit of societal progress?
This argument is philosophical i.e. worthless. We will actually have to win with death to answer the question if it's good or not. It's not something you can figure out without doing it.
Re:What ever happened to the first cryogenically frozen humans?
by telotortium on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @06:37AM
(#34064526)
Raising children (and later, grandchildren) is the obvious answer.
Re:What ever happened to the first cryogenically frozen humans?
by scotty79 on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @07:01AM
(#34064726)
Why not grand-grand-children? Current point looks like optimum, but it's really arbitrary and imposed only by external constraint of length of human life.
It's not (only) about old people having short term vision/not enough time for reeducation.
25 or 30 year old people are already very often set in stone and unable to change their views and they have most of their life ahead of them.