Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by revolvingocelot on Monday December 19, 2022 @09:36AM
(#34052500)
Grandparent comment is a triple entendre: the historical British tendency to take priceless cultural treasures home with them for display is being inverted; the modern British tendency to retire/vacation in Spain is being noted; and I think there's also a jab at Brexit disallowing easy movement, as more people can more easily see a thing exhibited in an EU museum than in a British one due to the Schengen area.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by AntoniusBlock on Monday December 19, 2022 @09:39AM
(#34052526)
Looks like it breaks multiple guidelines:
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by wholinator2 on Monday December 19, 2022 @10:32AM
(#34053225)
I read through the guidelines and couldn't find any rules it was breaking. What guidelines do you believe are broken by the top comment?
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by taco_emoji on Monday December 19, 2022 @10:43AM
(#34053367)
It's breaking "don't be snarky" at the very least, although that rule is barely ever enforced
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by AntoniusBlock on Monday December 19, 2022 @10:45AM
(#34053391)
>Don't be snarky.
>Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents.
>Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by PhasmaFelis on Monday December 19, 2022 @11:13AM
(#34053752)
Calling this "flamebait" or "ideological battle" is pretty over-the-top.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by ROTMetro on Monday December 19, 2022 @01:16PM
(#34055490)
Because it's entirely one sided and anyone that was to challenge it knows their comments aren't welcome.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by iambateman on Monday December 19, 2022 @11:00AM
(#34053574)
Sometimes guidelines are meant to be broken, and I think taking an opportunity to make a jab at the long history of British colonialism and cultural appropriation was worth it.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by ROTMetro on Monday December 19, 2022 @01:15PM
(#34055475)
How many of these 'cultures' being appropriated were the same culture or inheritors that the British 'appropriated' from? How many of these cultures respected these items on a cultural level? How many just happened to be living in the same physical location where these items are from but had no cultural connection (Rosetta stone)? It's a pretty one sided conversation you all are having, and one that can't be expanded without breaking the guidelines, hence the guidelines. But it's ok because you are directing this at an 'out' group.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by izacus on Monday December 19, 2022 @11:27AM
(#34053961)
I'll allow it.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by pepperidgeFarm on Monday December 19, 2022 @12:44PM
(#34055016)
Pepperidge Farm remembers when tasteful multi-layered entendres on HN were appreciated.
This is in fact what we designed our multilayered packaging on for our delicious Milano cookies.
A multi-layered delight of highly processed wheat with Italian history.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by boston_clone on Monday December 19, 2022 @01:09PM
(#34055382)
accounts like yours, on the other hand, are obviously low-effort and should be removed.
Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz...
by pepperidgeFarm on Monday December 19, 2022 @06:17PM
(#34059242)
I think we can both agree that effort and quality of outcome are not always proportional.
You have no idea how much effort Pepperidge Farms put into that last comment.