‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazzles historians

Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz... by wholinator2 on Monday December 19, 2022 @10:32AM (#34053225)

I read through the guidelines and couldn't find any rules it was breaking. What guidelines do you believe are broken by the top comment?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz... by taco_emoji on Monday December 19, 2022 @10:43AM (#34053367)

It's breaking "don't be snarky" at the very least, although that rule is barely ever enforced

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz... by AntoniusBlock on Monday December 19, 2022 @10:45AM (#34053391)

>Don't be snarky.

>Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents.

>Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz... by PhasmaFelis on Monday December 19, 2022 @11:13AM (#34053752)

Calling this "flamebait" or "ideological battle" is pretty over-the-top.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ find of 1,300-year-old necklace dazz... by ROTMetro on Monday December 19, 2022 @01:16PM (#34055490)

Because it's entirely one sided and anyone that was to challenge it knows their comments aren't welcome.

[ Parent | on HN ]