Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by mcv on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @04:41AM
(#33981637)
As warning, not as victim blaming, I'd like to point out that you should never ever risk money that you can't afford to lose on high-risk investments. Especially not extremely high risk stuff like cryptocurrencies, NFTs and similar scams.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by HPMOR on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @12:36AM
(#33980343)
I am of the mindset that non-violent offenders, should not suffer a life penalty regardless of their alleged crime. They played a game and lost, they should not lose their head as well.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by heartbeats on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:09AM
(#33980866)
A game with whose stakes?
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by wikfwikf on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @05:15AM
(#33981810)
Hear me out, what if we allowed people to access health care regardless of who has how much money?
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by oblio on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @06:24AM
(#33982158)
While your direct point is valid (for the US), you're missing the general point.
Money can be tied to life changing/life threatening events or situations in many more scenarios.
The archetypal scenarios are people losing college money, retirement savings, downpayments for their kid's apartments/houses, etc.
There are many ways in which money is very, very real.
Anyone who still clings to this "fiat" thesis is just detached from human reality.
Money is made up - that doesn't mean it doesn't have consequences.